Comparison of Four Automated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassays: ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT I2000sr, Elecsys E170, and Unicel Dxi800.
10.3343/alm.2018.38.4.355
- Author:
Joonhong PARK
1
;
Seungok LEE
;
Yeongsic KIM
;
Aeran CHOI
;
Hyeyoung LEE
;
Jihyang LIM
;
Yonggoo KIM
;
Kyungja HAN
;
Eun Jee OH
Author Information
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. ejoh@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Carcinoembryonic antigen;
Electrochemiluminescence;
ADVIA Centaur XP;
ARCHITECT i2000sr;
Elecsys E170;
Unicel DxI800;
Between-assay comparison
- MeSH:
Bias (Epidemiology);
Biomarkers, Tumor;
Breast Neoplasms;
Carcinoembryonic Antigen*;
Disease Progression;
Immunoassay*;
Lung;
Statistics as Topic
- From:Annals of Laboratory Medicine
2018;38(4):355-361
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the tumor markers available for evaluating disease progression status after initial therapy and monitoring subsequent treatment modalities in colorectal, gastrointestinal, lung, and breast carcinoma. We evaluated the correlations and differences between widely used, automated CEA immunoassays at four different medical laboratories. METHODS: In total, 393 serum samples with CEA ranging from 3.0 to 1,000 ng/mL were analyzed on ADVIA Centaur XP (Siemens Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA), ARCHITECT i2000sr (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA), Elecsys E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and Unicel DxI800 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), and the results were compared. Deming regression, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the data correlation and % differences among these assays. RESULTS: Deming regression analysis of data from Elecsys E170 and UniCel DxI800 showed good correlation (y=3.1615+0.8970x). According to Bland-Altman plot, no statistically significant bias (−1.78 ng/mL [95% confidence interval: −4.02 to 0.46]) was observed between Elecsys E170 and UniCel DxI800. However, the relative differences of CEA concentrations between assays exceeded the acceptable limit of 30%. Regarding the agreement of positivity with cut-off value 5.0 ng/mL, ARCHITECT i2000sr and Elecsys E170 showed the highest agreement (95.2%), whereas ADVIA Centaur XP and ARCHITECT i2000sr showed the lowest agreement (70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Agreements between automated CEA immunoassays are variable, and individual CEA concentrations may differ significantly between assays. Standardization of serum CEA concentrations and further harmonization are needed.
