A Systematic Review of Benefit of Silicone Intubation in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.
- Author:
Min Gyu KANG
1
;
Woo Sub SHIM
;
Dong Keun SHIN
;
Joo Yeon KIM
;
Ji Eun LEE
;
Hahn Jin JUNG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Review
- Keywords: Meta-Analysis; Dacryocystorhinostomy; Endoscopy; Silicones; Failure
- MeSH: Dacryocystorhinostomy*; Endoscopy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intubation*; Population Characteristics; Postoperative Complications; Silicon*; Silicones*; Stents
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2018;11(2):81-88
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Insertion of a silicone stent during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the most common procedure to prevent rhinostomy closure. It has been claimed that silicone intubation improves the surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR. However, many reports have documented an equally high success rate for surgery without silicone intubation. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the outcomes of endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation and determine whether silicone intubation is actually beneficial for patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant controlled trials evaluating endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation. The search was restricted to English articles published between January 2007 and December 2016. Relevant articles were reviewed to obtain information pertaining to interventions and outcomes. We also performed a meta-analysis of the relevant literature. RESULTS: In total, 1,216 patients included in 12 randomized controlled trials were pooled. A total of 1,239 endoscopic DCR procedures were performed, and silicone stents were used in 533 procedures. The overall success rate for endoscopic DCR was 91.9% (1,139/1,239), while the success rates with and without silicone intubation were 92.9% (495/533) and 91.2% (644/706), respectively. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among the included studies. A meta-analysis using a fixed-effects models showed no significant difference in the success rate between endoscopic DCR with silicone intubation and that without silicone intubation (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.12; P=0.148; z=1.45). Furthermore, there were no significant differences with regard to surgical complications such as synechia, granulation, and postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSION: The findings of our meta-analysis suggest that the success rate and postoperative complication rate for endoscopic DCR is not influenced by the use of silicone intubation during the procedure.
