Relationships between Gross Motor Capacity and Neuromusculoskeletal Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy after Short-Term Intensive Therapy.
10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.3.90
- Author:
Ki Jeon KIM
1
Author Information
1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, College of medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea. cesspool@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gross motor capacity;
Neuromusculoskeletal function;
Cerebral palsy;
Short-term intensive therapy
- MeSH:
Cerebral Palsy*;
Child*;
Classification;
Critical Care;
Early Intervention (Education);
Female;
Humans;
Muscle Spasticity;
Muscle Strength;
Range of Motion, Articular
- From:
Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
2018;30(3):90-95
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between gross motor capacity and neuromuscular function in children with cerebral palsy (CP) through a short-term intensive intervention. METHODS: Twenty-four children younger than 6 years of age (17 boys, 7 girls, mean age±standard deviation, 42.71±14.43 months) who were diagnosed with CP underwent short-term intensive treatment for 8 weeks. An evaluation of gross motor function capacity using the gross motor function measure (GMFM-66 and GMFM-88) was performed to measure muscle strength, selective motor control (SMC), and spasticity, factors related to neuromusculoskeletal function. Changes in spasticity, strength, range of motion, selective motor function, and exercise intensity scores were evaluated in terms of the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) and ages. RESULTS: The GMFM-88 and GMFM-66 scores significantly increased, by 4.32±4.04 and 2.41±1.51%, respectively, following the 8-week intervention. The change in the GMFM-66 score did not reflect a statistically significant difference in the GMFCS level. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the GMFM-88 score change in individuals at GMFCS Level III, the strength and spasticity of subjects at GMFCS Levels I–II did not significantly differ (p < 0.05). The changes in the GMFM-66 scores for strength, SMC, range of motion (ROM), and spasticity significantly differed according to age (p < 0.05) in children aged 36 months and older. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in strength, SMC, and spasticity (p < 0.05) before and after intensive short-term treatment. CONCLUSION: The 8-week short-term intensive care intervention improved the motor function score of study participants, emphasizing the need for early intervention and additional research in this area.
