Factors Associated With Discharge Destination in Advanced Cancer Patients With Bone Metastasis in a Japanese Hospital.
10.5535/arm.2018.42.3.477
- Author:
Katsuhiro HAYASHI
1
;
Tetsutaro YAHATA
;
Ryota MURAMOTO
;
Norio YAMAMOTO
;
Akihiko TAKEUCHI
;
Shinji MIWA
;
Takashi HIGUCHI
;
Kensaku ABE
;
Yuta TANIGUCHI
;
Hisaki AIBA
;
Yoshihiro ARAKI
;
Hiroyuki TSUCHIYA
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. khayashi830@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Neoplasms;
Rehabilitation;
Treatment outcome
- MeSH:
Activities of Daily Living;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*;
Baths;
Humans;
Mortality;
Neoplasm Metastasis*;
Rehabilitation;
Retrospective Studies;
ROC Curve;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2018;42(3):477-482
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To analyze patient characteristics of cancer rehabilitation and outcomes at our hospital. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 580 patients, who underwent cancer rehabilitation at our hospital and rehabilitation outcome after therapy were investigated. The relationship between the initial Barthel index and discharge outcomes was investigated, with a special focus on cancer patients with bone metastasis. The Barthel index and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) before and after rehabilitation were analyzed, and threshold value of home discharge was calculated from a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). General criteria for home discharge from our hospital included independence in performing basic activities of daily living such as bathing, feeding, and toileting or availability of home support from a family member/caregiver. RESULTS: The outcomes after rehabilitation among all the patients were as follows: discharge home 59%, death 13%, and others 27%. Statistical differences were observed between the initial and final values of the Barthel index in patients with bone metastasis, who could be discharged home (p=0.012). ROC analysis of the initial Barthel index for predicting home discharge revealed a threshold value of 60, sensitivity of 0.76, and specificity of 0.72. CONCLUSION: The patients with bone metastasis had a lower rate of home discharge and a higher rate of mortality than all the study patients who underwent cancer rehabilitation at our hospital. It is proposed that at the time of initiation of rehabilitation for patients with bone metastasis, an initial Barthel index lower than 60 might predict a worse outcome than home discharge.
