Laxative Choice and Treatment Outcomes in Childhood Constipation: Clinical Data in a Longitudinal Retrospective Study.
10.5223/pghn.2018.21.2.101
- Author:
Atchariya CHANPONG
1
;
Seksit OSATAKUL
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. catchari@medicine.psu.ac.th
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Constipation;
Laxatives;
Prognostic factors;
Recurrence;
Treatment outcome
- MeSH:
Child;
Constipation*;
Defecation;
Diagnosis;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Hypersensitivity;
Laxatives;
Medical Records;
Milk Proteins;
Polyethylene Glycols;
Quality of Life;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies*;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
2018;21(2):101-110
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Functional constipation (FC) is a common gastrointestinal (GI) problem affecting children's well-being and quality of life. Although polyethylene glycol (PEG) is recommended as the first line therapy, it is not always applicable in lower socioeconomic populations. Hence, this study aimed to compare clinical courses of FC in children treated with different medications in order to identify prognostic factors related to treatment outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients aged ≤15 years diagnosed with FC according to the Rome IV criteria from 2007 to 2015 at the GI clinic, Songklanagarind Hospital. Baseline characteristic, medical history, and treatment outcomes were collected at first and subsequent visits. RESULTS: Exactly 104 patients (median age at diagnosis, 2.8 years) were diagnosed with FC. The number of follow-up visits per patient ranged from 1 to 35. The median duration of follow-up was 18.0 months (range, 6.0–84.2 months). PEG was given to 21% of patients. During the follow up period, 76% of patients experienced first recovery with a median time to recovery of 9.8 months. There were no significant differences in time until first recovery and relapse between patients who received and those who did not receive PEG (p=0.99 and 0.06, respectively). Age >6 years, normal defecation frequency, no history of cow's milk protein allergy, and use of laxatives were associated with successful outcomes. CONCLUSION: Treatment outcomes between patients who had and never had PEG demonstrated no significant difference in our study. Hence, current practices in laxative prescriptive patterns may be effective.
