A Paradigm Shift: Perioperative Iron and Erythropoietin Therapy for Patient Blood Management.
- Author:
Hyesun LEE
1
;
Young Jin YUH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Anemia; Iron; Erythropoietin; Bloodless medical and surgical procedures; Perioperative care
- MeSH: Anemia; Blood Transfusion; Bloodless Medical and Surgical Procedures; Erythropoietin*; Hemorrhage; Humans; Iron*; Neurosurgery; Orthopedics; Patient Care; Perioperative Care; Prognosis; Thoracic Surgery; Tranexamic Acid; Venous Thrombosis
- From:Hanyang Medical Reviews 2018;38(1):16-26
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Allogeneic blood transfusion is often restricted due to its adverse effects, a lack of blood supply, and religious or cultural constraints. As a result, patient blood management (PBM) has been gaining attention. PBM is an evidence-based, patient-centered bundle of technologies that manages perioperative anemia and reduces bleeding during surgery. PBM improves the postoperative prognoses. Perioperative anemia is the main concern in PBM; therefore, to diagnose and treat it is important. This review focuses on the perioperative use of oral or intravenous iron and erythropoietin (EPO), in relevant fields such as cardiac surgery, orthopedics, and neurosurgery. IV administration of iron has been controversial due to safety concerns, such as increased risk of infection. However, using IV iron appropriately is beneficial in most surgical settings. Although recombinant human EPO may increase thromboembolic risks, this can be mitigated through various methods including limiting the target Hb level, using it in combination with IV iron, or prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis. EPO is recommended in patients undergoing cardiac or orthopedic surgery. As PBM becomes globally implemented, the blood management methods, including tranexamic acid, hemostatic agents, and cell salvage have become more variable as well. Among them, administration of iron and EPO would be the most common pharmacologic choices based on current practice. However, controversy still exists. Therefore, further studies on iron and EPO are needed to ensure better and safer patient care.
