The Problems and the Improvement Plan of the Hospice/Palliative Care and Dying Patient's Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment Act.
10.14475/kjhpc.2018.21.1.1
- Author:
Myunghee KIM
1
Author Information
1. Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy, Seoul, Korea. rosamhk@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Legislation ; Review
- Keywords:
Life support care;
Hospices;
Palliative care;
Decision making
- MeSH:
Bioethics;
Decision Making;
Hospices;
Humans;
Jurisprudence;
Life Support Care;
Palliative Care
- From:Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
2018;21(1):1-8
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Nearly 20 years after the Boramea Hospital case, the act on decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients in hospice and palliative care or at the end of life has taken effect on February 4, 2018 as recommended by the National Bioethics Committee. However, during the legislation process, some parts of the bill that stakeholders and concerned parties did not see eye to eye were either revised or removed. Moreover, the hospice and palliative care part was added in the last minute before the enactment. As a result, the law includes parts that are not in line with the recommendations from the National Bioethics Committee, thereby causing various problems. Therefore, it is crucial to monitor how the decisions on life-sustaining treatments are made in the field and gather various opinions of concerned parties to identify and address problems in the early stage of the implementation of the law. Based on the data, the legislation must be amended to fulfill its purpose that is “to protect the dignity and value of human beings by assuring the best interests of the patients and by respecting their self-determination”.
