Bone Anchoring for the Correction of Posterior Nasal Septum.
10.3342/kjorl-hns.2017.00780
- Author:
Sung Jae HEO
1
;
Eun Joo CHA
;
Ji Hye PARK
;
Hak Geon KIM
;
Jung Soo KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. profsookim@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cartilage;
Nasal septum;
Reconstructive surgical procedures;
Surgery
- MeSH:
Cartilage;
Humans;
Methods;
Nasal Obstruction;
Nasal Septum*;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures;
Recurrence;
Rhinometry, Acoustic;
Rhinoplasty;
Suture Anchors*
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
2018;61(3):139-142
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Various techniques have been reported for the correction of deviated nasal septum, most of them for caudal septal cartilage. For deviated posterior septal cartilage, the typical method of the day is the resection of deviated portion. However, we developed a bone anchoring technique that conservatively corrects deviated posterior septal cartilage. The aim of the current study is to determine the efficacy of this bone anchoring technique. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The patients who had undergone septoplasty using bone anchoring technique by a single surgeon (J.S.K) between October 2015 and June 2016 were enrolled in this study. The result of the surgery was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS, ranged 0– 10) for nasal obstruction, acoustic rhinometry, and assessment of surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included in this study. The VAS of nasal obstruction was significantly decreased after surgery from 7.5±1.7 to 2.4±1.4. In acoustic rhinometry, minimal cross-sectional area and volume were increased after surgery from 0.35±0.18 to 0.52±1.40 cm2 and from 3.6±1.1 to 5.8±1.5 cm3, respectively. Most of the deviated septum was well corrected, and complication or recurrence did not developed. CONCLUSION: Bone anchoring technique is easy to perform. It enables the preservation of septal cartilage, which is useful in revision septoplasty or rhinoplasty. We conclude that this technique is a good method for the correction of deviated posterior septal cartilage.
