Medical students' clinical performance of dealing with patients in the context of domestic violence.
- Author:
Hyun Hee KONG
1
;
Sunju IM
;
Ji Hyun SEO
;
Do Kyong KIM
;
HyeRin ROH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Domestic violence; Child abuse; Elderly abuse; Undergraduate medical education; Clinical performance
- MeSH: Checklist; Child; Child Abuse; Clinical Competence; Confidentiality; Disclosure; Domestic Violence*; Education, Medical, Undergraduate; Humans; Negotiating; Students, Medical
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Education 2018;30(1):31-40
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to inquire about the clinical performance and determine the performance pattern of medical students in standardized patient (SP) based examinations of domestic violence (DV). METHODS: The clinical performance sores in DV station with SP of third-year (n=111, in 2014) and 4th-year (n=143, in 2016) medical students of five universities in the Busan-Gyeongnam Clinical Skills Examination Consortium were subjected in this study. The scenarios and checklists of DV cases were developed by the case development committee of the consortium. The students’ performance was compared with other stations encountered in SP. The items of the checklists were categorized to determine the performance pattern of students investigating DV into six domains: disclosure strategy (D), DV related history taking (H), checking the perpetrator’s psychosocial state (P), checking the victim’s condition (V), negotiating and persuading the interviewee (N), and providing information about DV (I). RESULTS: Medical students showed poorer performance in DV stations than in the other stations with SP in the same examination. Most students did confirm the perpetrator and commented on confidentiality but ignored the perpetrator’s state and patient’s physical and psychological condition. The students performed well in the domains of D, H, and I but performed poorly in domains P, V, and N. CONCLUSION: Medical students showed poor clinical performance in the DV station. They performed an ‘event oriented interview’ rather than ‘patient centered’ communication. An integrated educational program of DV should be set to improve students’ clinical performance.
