Corrective Septorhinoplasty in Acute Nasal Bone Fractures.
- Author:
Jisung KIM
1
;
Hahn Jin JUNG
;
Woo Sub SHIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Nasal Bone; Bone Fractures; Rhinoplasty
- MeSH: Female; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Male; Nasal Bone*; Neck; Osteotomy; Rhinoplasty; Surgeons; Telephone
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2018;11(1):46-51
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Closed reduction is generally recommended for acute nasal bone fractures, and rhinoplasty is considered in cases with an unsatisfactory outcome. However, concomitant rhinoplasty with fracture reduction might achieve better surgical outcomes. This study investigated the surgical techniques and outcomes in patients who underwent rhinoplasty and fracture reduction concomitantly, during the acute stage of nasal bone fracture. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent concomitant rhinoplasty and fracture reduction were enrolled. Nasal bone fractures were classified into three major types (type I, simple fracture; type II, fracture line that mimics nasal osteotomy; and type III, comminuted fracture) based on computed tomography images and preoperative facial images. Two independent otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons evaluated the surgical outcomes and telephone based survey were made to evaluate patients satisfaction. RESULTS: Among 45 patients, there were 39 males and 6 females. Type I was the commonest type of fracture with 18 patients (40%), while the most frequently used surgical technique for corrective surgery was dorsal augmentation with 44 patients (97.8%). The mean visual analogue scale satisfaction score of the surgeons and patients were 7.62 and 8, respectively, with no significant differences between fracture types. CONCLUSION: Concomitant rhinoplasty with fracture reduction can be performed for acute nasal bone fracture patients, and it might lead to better aesthetic outcomes.
