Role of p16, Ki-67 and human papilloma virus type in the shunt treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaⅡ
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2018.03.003
- VernacularTitle:p16、Ki-67表达及人乳头瘤病毒型别在子宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅱ级治疗分流中的作用
- Author:
Xiaofeng ZHAO
1
;
Shufang SONG
;
Jianjun LU
;
Yuanyuan YI
;
Xiaoyi DAI
Author Information
1. 内蒙古医科大学附属医院妇产科
- Keywords:
Uterine cervical neoplasms;
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure;
Genes;
p16;
Ki-67 antigen
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2018;30(3):157-160
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the role of p16,Ki-67 and human papilloma virus(HPV)type in the shunt treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Ⅱ. Methods The paraffin block on file and the pathological results from loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) of 377 CIN Ⅱpatients diagnosed with colposcope examination accompanied by cervical high-risk HPV infection in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department from January 2014 to October 2016 were collected. The paraffin sections were stained with p16 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. The correlation between the expression of p16 and Ki-67 in biopsy tissues and the pathological results after LEEP was analyzed.HPV type and pathological results after LEEP were also analyzed.Results LEEP postoperative pathological grade in 337 cases of CINⅡpatients was divided into two groups(＜CINⅡ and ≥CINⅡ). There was no statistical difference in age between the two groups (t = 3.078, P = 0.063). There were statistical differences in the expressions of p16+and Ki-67+between the two groups[3.6 %(8/233) vs. 88.5 % (92/104), χ 2=235.54,P<0.001; 3.0 %(7/233) vs. 76.9 % (80/104), χ 2= 197.63, P< 0.001]. There was a statistical difference in HPV infection type between the two groups (χ2= 12.713, P = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity of p16+and Ki-67+for LEEP postoperative≥CINⅡ was 88.89 % vs.77.78 % and 95.96 % vs.95.80 % respectively. There was a statistical difference in group type of p16 and Ki-67 in both groups (χ2=304.28, P< 0.001). The sensitivity of p16+Ki-67+was 90.73 % and the specificity was 98.74 % in CINⅡpatients for LEEP postoperative. Conclusions The expressions of p16 and Ki-67 can guide the colposcopic biopsy for the treatment of CINⅡ. For CINⅡpatients with p16+Ki-67+, the active treatment should be taken. Close observation needs to follow for p16 and Ki-67 single negative or double negative patients. Active treatment should be performed for CINⅡpatients with HPV16 type infection in CINII. Age can not be used as the basis for the patients with shunt CINⅡ.
