Comprehensive evaluation of patient satisfaction based on bounded rationality theory
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2018.09.010
- VernacularTitle:基于有限理性理论的患者满意度综合评价研究
- Author:
Jie CHEN
1
;
Yu QIAN
;
Xiaohe WANG
;
Xiaofei DONG
;
Xianhong HUANG
;
Hui WANG
;
Guoguan ZHENG
;
Lina ZHU
Author Information
1. 310036,杭州师范大学医学院卫生事业管理系
- Keywords:
Patient satisfaction;
Bounded rationality;
Combined weight;
Comprehensive evaluation;
Scale
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
2018;34(9):743-748
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To further improve the comprehensive evaluation program of patient satisfaction in view of the defective item screening and weight design short of considerations for patients'psychological expectation and rational judgment, based on the theory of bounded rationality. Methods A satisfaction measurement scale was compiled and used to survey 847 inpatients in July-August 2017. The internal consistency test, correlation and factor analysis were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. The combination weight PWi was calculated based on patients' importance of the five satisfaction dimensions and the scoring of certainty degree of their responses. The combination weight EWi was calculated based on the five-dimension importance and operability scoring of expert consultation. The indicator combination weight OWi was determined using the integrated factors scoring, TOPSIS, weight rank-sun ratio, gray correlation method, and synthetic index method were used in a general assessment of patient satisfaction of a hospital in question. Results The Cronbach α coefficient of the patient satisfaction rating scale was 0.939, and the half-reliability coefficient was 0.951. The cumulative contribution rate of the five common factors variance extracted from the factor analysis was 71. 4%. The rational weights of five dimensions of service environment, service efficiency, service attitude, service technology, and service costs were 0.220, 0.214, 0.217, 0.179, and 0.171 respectively, while the comprehensive weights of the five dimensions were 0.115, 0.233, 0.196, 0.264, and 0.192 respectively. The comprehensive evaluation results of the two correlation coefficients were greater than 0.95. Conclusions The patient satisfaction measurement scale developed based on the theory of bounded rationality can expand the index connotation and items of core elements such as service technology and cost. The design of index weights fits with the concern of medical service factors and the degree of rational judgment in the patient's medical treatment process. The evaluation results are basically consistent with the actual situation and can be used as a reference tool for the scientific rational evaluation of patient satisfaction.
