Academic level assessment of randomized controlled trial abstracts in papers on budesonid adjuvant therapy for children pneumonia
10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2017.11.010
- VernacularTitle:布地奈德辅助治疗小儿肺炎随机对照试验报告摘要质量评价
- Author:
Jiang-Lin ZHANG
1
;
Jie-Ting HU
;
Li ZHANG
;
Yi-Jie PEI
;
Ming-Rong ZHANG
;
Cai-Yun ZHANG
;
Zhi-Gang ZHANG
;
Jin-Hui TIAN
Author Information
1. 兰州大学护理学院
- Keywords:
Randomized controlled trial;
Abstract;
CON-SORT;
Budesonid;
Children pneumonia;
Evidence-based medicine
- From:Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
2017;26(11):53-58
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the academic level of randomized controlled trial abstracts in papers on budesonid adjuvant therapy for children pneumonia and analyze its influencing factors. Methods The randomized controlled tri-al abstracts in papers on budesonid adjuvant therapy for children pneumonia were assessed according to the CON-SORT 2010 Statement and were statistically analyzed using the RevMan 5 . 3 . Results The items with a low reporting rate of the randomized controlled trial abstracts in the 282 papers included in this paper were "title judged as ran-dom","communication author","randomized","blind method","randomized grouping cases","fund-suppor-ted". Hierarchical analysis showed that the number of words in abstracts played an important role in affecting the reported items. Conclusion The academic level of randomized controlled trial abstracts in papers on budesonid adju-vant therapy for children pneumonia is significantly different from that of the abstracts in clinical papers according to the CONSORT 2010 Statement. Researchers should thus use the CONSORT 2010 Statement-defined items in writing their papers in order to improve the academic level and readability of their abstracts.
