Evaluation of performance and application of three nucleic acid extraction methods for quantification of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2018.01.013
- VernacularTitle:三种核酸提取方法用于检测血浆EBV-DNA的性能及应用评价
- Author:
Yuhong ZHENG
1
;
Yansong CHEN
;
Jianji PAN
;
Shaojun LIN
;
Zhenzhou XIAO
;
Jingfeng ZONG
;
Yingying LIN
;
Qiaojuan GUO
;
Yuanji XU
;
Yan CHEN
Author Information
1. 福建医科大学附属肿瘤医院检验科
- Keywords:
Herpesvirus 4;
human;
DNA;
viral;
Centrifugation;
DNA cleavage;
Automation;
laboratory;
Clinical laboratory techniques;
Evaluation studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2018;41(1):59-65
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate and compare the analytical performances and application values of three nucleic acid extraction methods for quantification of plasma Epstein-Barr Virus ( EBV ) DNA. Methods It used silica membrane spin column , boiling and automated magnetic bead method to extract viral nucleic acid in parallel , and combined real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR assays for quantitative EBV-DNA quantification.The performances of three methods were determined and compared by using the third-party reference materials , and the clinical values were analyzed by pairing detecting 100 NPC patients and 100 healthy subjects in pair .Results The accuracy and imprecision of three methods were all in line with requirements , and the results of clinical samples were linearly correlated . But actually the reproducibility and intermediate imprecision of the magnetic bead method were smaller and stable than those of the spin column method and the boiling method ( all <3％);the limit of detection for the magnetic bead method was 3.334 ×101 IU/ml, better than that of spin column method (4.159 ×101 IU/ml) and boiling method (8.511 ×101 IU/ml);the linear range of the magnetic bead method was 5.4 ×101 -5.4 ×105 IU/ml, slightly wider than that of the boiling method (5.4 ×102 -5.4 ×105 IU/ml); the ability of anti -Hb interference ability of magnetic bead method is better than that of boiling method ;and the positive rate and the mean viral load of the NPC samples measured with the magnetic bead method were significantly higher (95％, 8.342 ×103 IU/ml) than those measured with the spin column method (84％, 4.707 ×103 IU/ml) and the boiling method (78％, 2.571 ×103 IU/ml) ( P all<0.05).Conclusion The automated magnetic bead nucleic acid extraction method offered better analytical performance and higher clinical value for EBV DNA quantification in plasma .
