The miss rate analysis of anti-HLA antibodies detection for kidney transplantation preoperative recipients with sensitization history based on luminex xMAP
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2018.02.004
- VernacularTitle:采用液相芯片技术检测肾移植术前致敏受者抗HLA抗体的初筛漏检情况分析
- Author:
Bo DAI
1
;
Jie ZHUANG
;
Lijuan WU
;
Tao LIN
;
Li WANG
Author Information
1. 四川大学华西医院
- Keywords:
Kidney transplantation;
Anti-HLA antibodies;
Luminex xMAP
- From:
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
2018;39(2):81-86
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To interrogate the detection of anti-HLA antibodies using two methods of Luminex xMAP,and to compare their detection capacity and to analyze their misdetection rate for initial screening,providing more accurate results in clinical practice.Methods 214 serum samples from recipients with a history of sensitization before renal transplantation were collected and detected by LM (LABScreen Mixed) and LSA (LABScreen Single Antigen) respectively on the Luminex xMAP platform.Results For the LM detection,the positive rates of anti-HLA class Ⅰ and Ⅱ were 50.9％ and 23.4％ respectively,which were lower than those used by the LSA detection (58.9％ and 46.7％ respectively).The difference had statistical significance (P ＜ 0.05).The sensitivity,specificity,miss rate and mistake rate of anti-HLA class Ⅰ and Ⅱ[detection were 80.2％,90.9％,19.8％,9.1％ and 49.0％,99.1％,51.0％,0.9％ respectively.The missed detection gene with the highest rate was Cw * 17:01,B * 15:12,B * 45:01 for anti-HLA class Ⅰ and DPA1 * 01:03,DPB1 * 06:01,DPA1 * 01:03,DPB1 * 01:01 for anti-HLA class Ⅱ.The highest MFI value was 10603 and 3659.For the recipients with only blood transfusion history or pregnancy history,LM and LSA detection showed no statistically significant difference when detecting anti-HLA class Ⅰ antibodies,but had statistically significant difference when testing anti-HLA class Ⅱ antibodies.For the patients with history of both blood transfusion and pregnancy history,LM and LSA showed no significant difference in the detection of anti-HLA class Ⅰ antibodies and anti-HLA class Ⅱ antibodies.The miss rate of anti-HLA class Ⅰ antibody detection was lower than that of anti-HLA class Ⅱ antibody detection.Conclusion LSA detection has the higher sensivity and lower miss rate than LM detection.In the light of the disadvantage of LM detection as diagnostic preliminary screening,it is suggested that LSA detection should be used directly for the recipients with a history of sensitization.By this process optimization,it is more likely to cause missent inspection and the occurrence of rejection,as well as a poor long-term survival rate.
