Accuracy of anesthesia index for monitoring depth of sedation induced by propofol: a comparison with bispectral index
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2017.12.027
- VernacularTitle:麻醉指数监测异丙酚镇静深度的准确性:与BIS的比较
- Author:
Yi JIANG
1
;
Lizhen YU
;
Yue LIU
Author Information
1. 325000,温州市中西医结合医院麻醉科
- Keywords:
Electroencephalography;
Monitoring,physiologic;
Propofol;
Conscious sedation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2017;37(12):1516-1519
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of anesthesia index (AI) for monitoring depth of sedation induced by propofol.Methods Thirty patients of both sexes,aged 41-64 yr,with body mass index of 20-30 kg/m2,of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia,were enrolled in the study.Propofol was given by target-controlled infusion (TCI) with the initial target effect-site concentration (Ce) of 1.2 μg/ml using Marsh pharmacokinetic model,and then the Ce of propofol was increased in 0.3 μg/ml increment,and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score was evaluated.OAA/S score was 5 before TCI of propofol.When OAA/S score reached 4,3,2 and 1 in turn during TCI of propofol,the bispectral index (BIS),AI and corresponding Ce were recorded.Results The correlation coefficients of BIS,AI and Ce levels with the OAA/S scores were rBIS-OAA/S =0.962,rAI-OAA/S =0.960 and rce-OAA/S =-0.795,respectively (P＜0.05).The correlation coefficients of BIS and AI with the Ce of propofol were rBIs-ce =-0.736 and rAI-Ce =-0.737,respectively (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between rBIS-OAA/s and rAI-oAA/S,and between rBIS-Ce and rAI-Ce (P＞ 0.05).Conclusion AI can accurately monitor the depth of sedation induced by propofol in adult patients without noxious stimuli and there is no significant change in the accuracy in comparison with BIS.
