Application of pubovesical complex preserving technique during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2018.07.009
- VernacularTitle:保留耻骨膀胱复合体技术在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的应用
- Author:
Zaisheng ZHU
1
;
Hongqi SHI
;
Pengfei ZHOU
;
Yibo ZHOU
;
Chunting CHANG
;
Qiang FU
Author Information
1. 321000,浙江大学金华医院泌尿外科
- Keywords:
Laparoscopic surgery;
Prostate cancer;
Sexual function;
Urinary incontinence
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2018;39(7):515-521
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To describe a novel pubovesical complex preserving technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and to evaluate its postoperative outcomes.Methods From January 2011 to May 2017,168 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively.Their mean age were 62.8 (46-74) years,preoperative PSA 11.3ng/ml,Gleason score 6.7,preoperative prostate volume 46.5 ml.They all got preoperative potency (IIEF-5 score ≥ 15 score).TNM clinical stage:cT1 123 cases,45 cases cT2.There were 59 patients with pubovesical complex preserving technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (group A):without pelvic fascia cut and deep vein complex suture.The preservation of the periprostatic anatomy was kept by preserving the pubovesical complex,including detrusor apron with pubovesical ligaments,DVC and NVB.There were 46 patients with conventional intrafascial laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (group B) and 63 patients with interfascial laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(group C).No differences were found between the three groups in terms of preoperative age,clinical staging,prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values,Gleason score at biopsy and preoperative good potency (IIEF-5 score)(P ＞0.05).Continence was defined as zero to one security pad per day.The three groups were compared for perioperative variables,PSM (positive surgical margin,PSM)rate,postoperative urinary continence functional and potency (IIEF-5 score).Biochemical recurrence-free survival was by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank.Results No differences were found in the three groups in terms of operative times,blood loss,catheterization time and postoperative stay and histologic status (PSM was similar to that of the groups (8.5％ in group A,13.0％ in group B vs.11.1％ in group C).Urinary incontinence:group A,the continence rate was 71％,82％,92％ and 100％ at 1,3 and 6 months after catheter removal,respectively;group B,the continence rate was 63％,80％,89％ and 96％ respectively;group C,it was 24％,54％,79％ and 86％ respectively.The group A showed a significantly earlier recovery from incontinence compared with that in the group C at immediately after catheter removal and 1 month after catheter remove (x2 =27.47,P ＜ 0.001;x2 =15.20,P ＜ 0.01).The group B showed a significantly earlier recovery from incontinence compared with that in the group C at immediately after catheter removal and 1 month,(x2 =17.00,P ＜ 0.01;x2 =8.20,P ＜ 0.05).No differences were found between the A and B groups at immediately after catheter removal and 1 month,(P ＞ 0.05).Regarding sexual function,at the postoperative 1,3,6 months,median IIEF-score was 10,11,16 in the group A,respectively,8,9,13 in the group B respectively,and 7,8,12 in the group C respectively.No differences were found in the three groups in potency (IIEF-5 score).Baseline IIEF-score was reached by 53％,35％ and 21％ at postoperative 6 months.There were significant differences between the A and the C groups.(x2 =13.45,P ＜0.01).There were no significant differences between the A and the B groups.(x2 =3.30,P ＞ 0.05).Follow-up was 31.6 (6-69) months.Biochemical recurrence-free survival at 3 years was 79.3％,76.3％ and 76.4％ by A,B and C group,respectively.Conclusions The pubovesical complex preserving technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy provides early recovery from incontinence,faster recovery of sexual function preoperative levels.
