Risk factors and treatment of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fracture during total hip arthroplasty
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2018.11.001
- VernacularTitle:全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体周围骨折的危险因素分析及处理
- Author:
Qi CHENG
1
;
Kaijin GUO
;
Fengchao ZHAO
;
Xin ZHENG
;
Yong PANG
;
Yi WANG
;
Jinlong TANG
;
Jiangjiang GU
Author Information
1. 221002,徐州医科大学附属医院骨科
- Keywords:
Arthroplasty,replacement,hip;
Acetabulum;
Fractures,bone;
Risk factors
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2018;38(11):641-649
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the risk factors of periprosthetic acetabular fracture in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to discuss the prevention and management.Methods A total of 1 023 patients (1 168 hips) undergoing THA were retrospectively analyzed between January 2012 and June 2015.There were 421 males (507 hips) and 602 females (661 hips),aged from 23 to 96 years with mean age of 64.2± 15.0 years.Primary total hip arthroplasty was conducted in 1 053 hips,while revision surgery was conducted in 115 hips.The reasons of periprosthetic acetabular fracture were summarized.Age,gender,BMI,primary disease,left or right sides,surgical approach,osteoporosis,prosthetic type,the coverage rate of acetabulum-bone,and the amount of surgical operation annually were compared between non-fracture and fracture.Risk factors associated with the fracture were analyzed using chi square test followed by a multivariate logistic regression.Furthermore,revision surgery was compared with primary THA using chi square test.Results The incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures was 2.8％ (33/1 168).The incidence of fracture was higher in revision surgery than that in primary THA (6.1％ vs.2.5％).Multivariate logistic regression showed that primary disease (developmental dysplasia of the hip and rheumatoid arthritis),osteoporosis,uncemented acetabular cup,the high-er coverage rate of acetabulum-bone,and the less amount of surgical operation annually were prone to appear periprosthetic acetabular fracture in primary THA.Among the 33 patients with acetabular fractures,13 cases (39.4％,13/33) were found intraoperatively and 20 cases (60.6％,20/33) postoperatively.Acetabular wall fractures were in 26 (78.8％,26/33),column fractures in 2 (6.1％,2/33),transverse fractures in 2 (6.1％,2/33) and quadrilateral surface fractures with prosthetic central dislocation in 3 (9.1％,3/33).Seven cases of 26 stable fractures and 6 cases of 7 unstable fractures were found intraoperatively.Acetabular wall fractures were fixed by additional augmentation screws or accepted no special treatment,and column fractures were fixed with plate.One quadrilateral surface fracture was accepted revision surgery using Jumbo cup,2 quadrilateral surface fractures and 2 transverse fractures with reconstruction cage.The patients were followed up for 42.3±13.7 months (range 29-60 months).The Harris hip score was 83.3±6.6 (range 72-94) at last follow-up.No complication,such as hip dislocation,osteolysis,and prosthetic loosening was reported.Conclusion Most of periprosthetic acetabular fiactures are wall fractures which could not endanger the periprosthetic stability.The detection rate of acetabular stable fracture is lower than that of unstable fracture in operation.Primary disease (developmental dysplasia of the hip and rheumatoid arthritis),osteoporosis,uncemented acetabular cup,the higher coverage rate of aeetabulum-bone,the less amount of surgical operation annually are the intraoperative risk factors which closely related to acetabular fractures of primary THA.The risk of intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures in revision THA is higher than that in primary THA.
