Comparison of different treatment modalities in node-positive patients after radical resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2018.03.005
- VernacularTitle:胸段食管鳞癌根治术后淋巴结阳性患者不同治疗方式比较
- Author:
Wenbin SHEN
1
;
Hongmei GAO
;
Shuchai ZHU
;
Teng LI
;
Shuguang LI
;
Youmei LI
;
Zhikun LIU
;
Juan LI
;
Jingwei SU
;
Jinrui XU
Author Information
1. 河北医科大学第四医院放疗科
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms/surgery;
Esophageal neoplasms/postoperative adjuvant therapy;
Prognosis;
Propensity score matching
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2018;27(3):250-255
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy between different modalities in the treatment of positive lymph nodes after radical resection for squamous cell carcinoma of thoracic esophagus(TESCC),and to explore the best treatment mode. The Kaplan?Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. The log-rank test and Cox model were used for univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses,respectively. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed among 548 patients with TESCC who were admitted to our hospital and had positive lymph nodes after radical resection. The efficacy of different treatment methods was evaluated. Propensity scores(PSM)were used to make 1-to-1 patient matching between different treatment groups to further analyze and figure out the best treatment model for patients. The Kaplan?Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS)rates. The log-rank test was used for survival analysis and univariate prognostic analysis. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results In all patients,the 1-,3-,and 5-year OS rates were 79.9%, 38.1% and 28.5%,respectively,while the 1-,3-,and 5-year DFS rates were 68.5%,39.8% and 32.5%, respectively. After 1-to-1 matching based on PSM,there were no differences in general clinical pathological data between the four groups. After PSM,there were significant differences in 1-,3-,and 5-year OS and DFS rates between the surgery alone group,the postoperative radiotherapy group,the postoperative chemotherapy group,and the postoperative chemoradiotherapy(POCRT)group(P=0.000,0.000).There were significant differences in OS and DFS rates between patients with stage N1,N2,and N3disease(P=0.000,0.000).The result of the Cox multivariate analysis showed that treatment method and N staging were two independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS(P=0.001,0.000,0.025,0.016). Conclusions Patients with positive lymph nodes after radical resection for TESCC have a poor prognosis. Moreover,the prognosis becomes worse with the increase in metastatic lymph nodes. POCRT may improve the survival in those patients. Prospective studies are needed to further confirm those conclusions.
