Assessment of occupational exposure doses to physicians in clinical practice at Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2018.11.010
- VernacularTitle:上海市质子重离子医院临床实践中放射治疗师的职业照射水平评估
- Author:
Zhulei LIU
1
;
Xiaowa WANG
;
Wei REN
Author Information
1. 201321,上海市质子重离子医院放射物理科
- Keywords:
Proton and heavy ion therapy;
Occupational exposure;
Radiation dose;
Physician
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2018;38(11):851-854
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the occupational exposure doses received by the physicians in clinical practice at Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center ( SPHIC ) . Methods A total of 40 patients treated from September to November in 2016, including 20 proton cases and 20 carbon cases at SPHIC, were selected using simple random sampling method. Particle type, total particle number and prescribed doses were recorded for all the cases. The dose rates in the control room were measured by using a photon and neutron personal radiation detector during patient treatment. The dose rates around the surface of the patient's tumor 1 min after completion of beam delivery and the dose rates about 30 cm to the tumor surface (where a physician stands) were also measured during unfixing and assisting the patients. Finally, the dose rates surrounding the fixtures, couch, robotic arm and window of BAMS were measured. The factors affecting the occupational exposure of physician were analyzed and the annual dose equivalent was assessed for physicians in SPHIC. Results Proton and heavy ion released nearly all energy in the tumor for Bragg peak advantage, so there was no induced radioactivity in the treatment room. However, the tumor became the main induced radioactivity source to the occupational exposure dose to physicians in clinical practices. The dose rate around the surface of the patient's tumor 1 min after completion of beam delivery was (20. 68 ± 21. 91) μSv/h, which was the highest in the working places of physicians, thus regarded as the main source. A significant positive correlation (r=0. 828, P<0. 05) was shown between dose rates and total number of particles delivered for the treatment. The dose rate measured in the control room was (0. 08 ± 0. 01 )μSv/h, and the dose rate measured surrounding the fixtures, couch, robotic arm and BAMS window was ( 0. 09 ± 0. 01 )μSv/h. No neutron was detected. The dose rate about 30 cm to the tumor surface ( where physicians stand) was ( 2. 03 ± 2. 84 ) μSv/h during unfixing and assisting the patients. The average annual dose to physicians was about 0. 508 mSv. Conclusions The average annual dose to physicians was at a low level in SPHIC
