Validity of the size-specific dose estimate derived from the water equivalent diameter value of the center slice of the scan range in the head CT examination
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005?1201.2018.07.010
- VernacularTitle:头颅CT扫描中心层面水当量直径估算体型特异性辐射剂量的可行性
- Author:
Jian XU
1
;
Junfa CHEN
;
Dewang MAO
;
Huawei XIAO
;
Jianguo XU
;
Fuhua CHEN
Author Information
1. 310014,浙江省人民医院杭州医学院附属人民医院放射科
- Keywords:
Radiation dosage;
Head;
Water-equivalent diameter;
Size-specific dose estimate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2018;52(7):538-542
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the validity of the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) derived from the water-equivalent diameter (Dw)value of the slice located in the middle of the scan range in the head CT examination. Methods A total of 197 patients underwent head CT nonenhanced scan were enrolled in this retrospective study. The Dw, size-dependent conversion factor (f), normalized volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and SSDE values of all slices were calculated. Two sets of SSDE, SSDEgroand SSDEcenbased on the Dwvalues slice by slice (Dw-gro) and the Dwvalues of the slices in the middle of the scan range (Dw-cen), were obtained across all patients. Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were performed for Dw-grovs Dw-cen, Spearman correlation analysis and linear regression analysis for SSDEgrovs SSDEcen, SSDE vs Dw, CTDIvolvs Dw. With the reference of SSDEgrovalue, mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of SSDEcen values were calculated to assess its accuracy and the correlated factors of MARD was analyzed with multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis. Results The minimal Dwvalue close to the roof of the skull corresponded to the maximal value of f and SSDE, which was the minimal value of CTDIvol. The significant positive correlation was showed between Dw-grovs Dw-cen, SSDEgrovs SSDEcen, SSDE vs Dw, CTDIvolvs Dw(r=0.947, 0.931, 0.416, 0.626;P<0.05). The values of Dw,groand Dw-cenwere (16.94±0.69) and (18.50±0.62) cm respectively. The values of SSDEgroand SSDEcenwere [54.10 (52.29, 56.39)] mGy and [53.77 (51.85, 55.25)] mGy respectively. An approximation of SSDEcenvalues with an average of 1.62% of the gross MARD was found to match the reference value. Multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis indicated that MARD had negative correlation with Dw(β=–1.319,P<0.05), positive correlation with CTDIvol(β=0.202,P<0.05), and f was not included in the multivariate regression equation. Conclusion SSDEcenbased on the Dwvalue of the slice located at the center of the scan range yields small MARD value and can represent a reliable SSDE estimation in the head CT examination.