Comparison of ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography in assessing treatment response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2018.05.008
- VernacularTitle:常规超声及超声光散射技术评估乳腺癌新辅助疗效的价值比较
- Author:
Wenxiang ZHI
1
;
Yiwu FAN
;
Yi GAO
;
Yu WANG
;
Fen WANG
;
Yaling CHEN
;
Aiyu MIAO
;
Shichong ZHOU
;
Zhaoting SHI
;
Jin ZHOU
;
Cai CHANG
Author Information
1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院超声科 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography;
Diffuse optical tomography;
Breast carcinoma;
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy;
Total hemoglobin concentration
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2018;27(5):406-410
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical value of conventional ultrasonographic ( US),US-guided diffuse optical tomography ( US-guided DOT ) and both combined to assess treatment response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy( NAC). Methods Eighty-eight breast cancer patients,totally 93 lesions were included in the study. Pre-and post-last chemotherapy,size,and total hemoglobin concentration ( THC) of each lesion were measured by conventional US and US-guided DOT before biopsy,the change of lesion Size( ΔSize) and the change of THC( ΔTHC) were calculated respectively.Based on the guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors,the responses to NAC were classified into complete response, partial response, static disease, progressive disease groups. The histological response to chemotherapy were categorised as partial pathological response and complete pathological response using Miller and Payne system. Results Of 93 breast cancers,the overall response rate was 81.7%,the cPR rate was 24.7%. According to ROC curve analysis,when ΔSize 42.6% and ΔTHC 23.9% as cutoff values to evaluate the complete response and partial response,the area under the curve ( AUC ) were 0.666 and 0.751,respectively,the AUC of US and US-guided DOT combined in parallel and in series were 0.680 and 0.737 respectively.When ΔSize 64.5% and ΔTHC 27.2% as cutoff values to evaluate complete pathologial response,the AUC were 0.690 and 0.728 respectively,the AUC of US and US-guided DOT combined in parallel and in series were 0.693 and 0.726 respectively. Conclusions US-guided DOT and US can be used to predict breast cancers response to NAC,US and US-guided DOT combined in parallel and in series can not improve response prediction comparing with US or US-guided DOT alone.
