Prompting drainage tube placement following fracture internal fixation or not: A prospective cohort study
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2018.06.001
- VernacularTitle:骨折内固定术后是否放置引流管的前瞻性队列研究
- Author:
Xu SUN
1
;
Ting LI
;
Zhijian SUN
;
Zhiqiang GAO
;
Yonggang SU
;
Shaoliang LI
;
Shiwen ZHU
;
Xinbao WU
Author Information
1. 100035,北京积水潭医院创伤骨科
- Keywords:
Fractures,bone;
Fracture fixation,internal;
Postoperative period;
Drainage
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2018;20(6):461-464
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effects of drainage tube placement after fracture internal fixation.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted of the 235 patients who were to undergo open reduction and internal fixation for tibia fracture,distal radial fracture or ankle joint fracture at Department of Orthopaedic Trauma,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March to August,2016.Of them,123 were assigned into an experimental group who were subjected to adequate hemostasis after releasing the tourniquet without drainage following surgery while 112 into a control group who were subjected to conventional hemostasis without relaxing the tourniquet and placement of drainage tubes.The 2 groups were compared in terms of postoperative hospital stay,wound condition,body temperature 3 days postoperatively,counts of hemoglobins,white blood cells and neutrophils,and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS).Results High fever was not observed in all the patients postoperatively.There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative hospital stay[(3.3 ± 1.6) d versus (3.7 ± 1.7) d],wound reddening,wound swelling,hemoglobins,white blood cells,neutrophils,or VAS scores postoperatively (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Drainage tube placement is not routinely necessary after internal fixation of simple fractures if surgical invasion is limited and hemostasis is adequate after intraoperative release of the tourniquet.
