The effect of daily quality checklist on intensive care unit severe patients with hospital associated infection
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2018.03.019
- VernacularTitle:每日质量核查对ICU重症患者院内感染的影响
- Author:
Hongyun TENG
1
;
Xiuling CHENG
;
Wanjie YANG
;
Wei WANG
;
Guijuan ZHANG
;
Yumei WANG
;
Xiuhua WEI
Author Information
1. 天津市第五中心医院重症医学科
- Keywords:
Intensive care unit;
Quality checklist;
Daily check and evaluation;
Severe patients;
Hospital associated infection
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
2018;25(3):297-301
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of daily quality checklist on intensive care unit (ICU) the incidence of severe patients with hospital associated infection (HAI). Methods A historical control study was conducted. In Tianjin Fifth Center Hospital from June 2016 to May 2017, 286 severe patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) and using ICU daily quality checklist were assigned as the experimental group, and from June 2015 to May 2016, 291 severe patients who did not use the daily quality checklist were selected as the control group. In the control group, the routine treatment, nursing care and ward rounds were the daily ordinary work; in the experimental group, the severe disease ICU quality checklist system was strictly carried out, and every day the doctor and nurse on duty applied the checklist to assess and verify the medical quality given to the patient, including sedation, analgesia, MV, glycemic control, nutrition, etc 16 items. The incidences of ventilation associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), 28-day mortality, time of MV and the length of ICU stay were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the incidences of VAP, CRBSI and CAUTI of experimental group were obviously decreased (VAP: 1.78‰ vs. 5.09‰, CRBSI: 1.46‰vs. 5.21‰; CAUTI: 1.39‰ vs. 4.41‰, all P ＜ 0.05), the time of MV and the length of ICU stay in experimental group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [the time of MV (days): 7.81±2.74 vs. 10.62±3.67, the length of ICU stay (days): 8.40±1.94 vs. 11.35±2.47, both P ＜ 0.05]; there was a decreasing tendency of 28-day mortality in experimental group compared with that in control group [5.24% (15/286) vs. 6.19% (18/291)], but no statistical significant difference was seen (P ＞ 0.05). Conclusion Implementation of daily quality checklist can effectively decrease the incidence of HAI in ICU patients, reduce the time of MV and the length of ICU stay.
