The efficacy of transurethral enucleation of bladder tumor in the treatment of non muscle-invasive bladder cancer
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.19.837
- VernacularTitle:经尿道膀胱肿瘤剜除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的应用价值
- Author:
Bo WEN
1
;
Ben LIU
;
Lu XIA
;
Chenxi YU
;
Shuqing HUANG
Author Information
1. 锦州医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科
- Keywords:
non muscle-invasive bladder cancer;
transurethral enucleation of bladder tumor (TUEBT);
transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT)
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
2018;45(19):1016-1020
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transurethral enucleation of bladder tumor(TUEBT) in the treatment of non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Methods: The clinical and pathological data of 82 NMIBC patients treated between No-vember 2015 and January 2018 in the First Affiliated Hospital of the Jinzhou Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The 82 NMIBC patients were divided into a TUEBT group (38 cases) and a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) group (44 cases). The differences in intraoperative indices, postoperative indices, and pathological staging between the two groups were compared. Re-sults: The bladder irrigation, indwelling catheter, and postoperative hospitalization times in the TUEBT group were (21.00 ± 3.55) h, (4.34±0.81) d, and (5.29±0.96) d, respectively, compared with (27.57±3.87) h, (5.32±0.83) d, and (6.32±0.86) d in the TURBT group, and the differences between groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The operative time in the TUEBT group [(29.55±4.13) min] was longer than in the TURBT group [(25.30±4.01) min]. The hemoglobin decrease in the TUEBT group [(2.00±0.38) g/dL] was less than that in the TURBT group [(2.30±0.32) g/dL]. The incidence of obturator nerve reflex in the TUEBT group was 13.16% (5/38), compared to 34.09% (15/44) in the TURBT group. The recurrence rate in the TUEBT group was 10.53% (4/38), compared to 29.55% (13/44) in the TURBT group. The detrusor deletion rate in the TUEBT group was 0 (0/38), compared to 31.82% (14/44) in the TURBT group. The re-peat transurethral resection (ReTUR) standard was met in 22 cases in the TUEBT group and 33 in the TURBT group. ReTUR due to lack of a detrusor was required in 0 cases in the TUEBT group and 14 in the TURBT group. The differences in the above clinical characteris-tics were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: TUEBT can remove a tumor completely, while preserving the detrusor, improv-ing the accuracy of pathological staging, and reducing the probability of ReTUR. For NMIBC, TUEBT can obtain satisfactory clinical effi-cacy, with surgical safety and long-term efficacy superior to those of TURBT.
