Effect of DNA immune absorption on lupus pneumonia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2018.03.009
- VernacularTitle:DNA免疫吸附在狼疮性肺炎中的疗效探讨
- Author:
Yu ZHUANG
1
;
Xuezhen ZHANG
;
Weiping LIN
;
Yuhang CHEN
;
Zhiwen WANG
;
Zhifen LYU
;
Zhiming TAN
Author Information
1. 516001,广东省惠州市中心人民医院风湿免疫科
- Keywords:
Systemic lupus erythematosus;
Lupus pneumonia;
Interstitial pneumonia;
DNA immunosorbent;
Plasma exchange
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2018;34(3):237-241
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical application and efficacy of DNA immune absorption in patients with lupus interstitial pneumonia.Methods to collect randomized 18 patients with lupus patients with pneumonia were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into immunoadsorption group and traditional CTX treatment group,in order to observe the ESR,CRP,ANA quantitative monitoring at different time,pulmonary function test (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide,DLCO),6 min walking distance,procalcitonin (PCT).The difference between groups was statistically analyzed and the effect of DNA immunization was discussed.Results There were significant differences between immunoadsorption group and control group in ESR at the different time points before and after the treatment (Fgroup =7.841,P＜0.05;Fcross =6.512,P ＜0.05;Finteraction =10.421,P＜0.05),CRP(Fgroup =6.995,P＜0.05;Fcross=5.847,P＜0.05;Finteraction =8.847,P＜ 0.05) and ANA quantitative monitoring (FgrouP =12.336,P ＜ 0.05;Fcross =11.214,P ＜ 0.05;Finteraction =15.847,P＜0.05).At 1 and 2 weeks after treatment,CRP and ESR of the immunoadsorption group began to decrease,and the difference was statistically significant compared with those before treatment (P ＜0.05),while the difference between the control group and the treatment group was statistically significant after 4 weeks (P＜0.05).After 2 weeks of treatment,there was a significant difference in ANA quantitative monitoring between the immunoadsorption group,compared with that before treatment.There was a significant difference between the control group before treatment and the 6 months after treatment (P＜0.05).There was a significant difference between the immunoadsorption group and the control group in pulmonary function test (FgrouP =6.222,P＜ 0.05:Fcross =7.154,P＜ 0.05:Finteraction =8.527,P ＜ 0.05),6 min walking distance (FgrouP =8.669,P＜ 0.05;Fcross =7.154,P ＜ 0.05;Finteraction =11.547,P＜ 0.05) and PCT (FgrouP =5.621,P ＜0.05;Fcross =4.125,P ＜ 0.05;Finteraction =7.554,P ＜ 0.05.The pulmonary function and 6 min walking distance of 2-week treatment in the immunoadsorption group.There showed a significant difference compared with that before treatment.The difference between the control group after 4 weeks of treatment and that before treatment was statistically significant (P=＜0.05).There was a significant difference between the 2 weeks PCT treatment in the immunoadsorption group and that before treatment (P＜0.05).There was a significant difference between the control group after 3 months of treatment and before treatment (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The treatment of lupus interstitial pneumonia in traditional regimens is ineffective,and the efficacy of DNA is better than that of conventional regimens,and reduces the risk of infection.
