Reliability and Validity Study of Chinese Version of Reflective Functioning Questionary-54
10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2017.10.004
- VernacularTitle:反思功能问卷-54中文版的修订及信效度研究
- Author:
Lisi XU
1
;
Guo LIU
;
Jiyang HAN
;
Xiaoen MO
;
Pengyang LIU
;
Xumei WANG
Author Information
1. 中国医科大学附属盛京医院心理科
- Keywords:
mentalization;
reflective function;
adults;
reliability;
validity
- From:
Journal of China Medical University
2017;46(10):878-881
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of reflective functioning questionary-54 (RFQ-54) in China.Methods School sample:a total of 635 students were selected for the study.Clinical patients:another 75 patients with borderline personality trait who visited Department of Psychiatry in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were recruited.All subjects filled the RFQ-54,MIS-BPD,TAS,FFMQ.44 students accepted the retest after three weeks.Results The internal consistency for RFQ-C and RFQ-U were both 0.628.The test-retest reliability was 0.835,0.683,respectively.The correlations with TAS,FFMQ,MIS-BPD supported its validity.The RFQ subscales scores were significant1y different between only-child and non-only child,urban and country,school group and clinical group (22.11 ± 1.34 vs 18.97 ± 1.22,22.59 ± 1.36 vs 17.61 ± 1.12,21.39 ± 1.32 vs 15.34 ± 1.08,10.95 ± 8.43 vs 13.58 ± 8.19,10.95 ± 8.36 vs 13.88 ± 8.26,11.47 ± 8.02 vs 22.43 ± 1.24,respectively.P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion The Chinese version of RFQ-54 shows good reliability and validity,which can be used to assess the reflective function of adults in China.
