Comparison of neurologic outcome between active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in asphyxia cardiac arrest
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.009
- VernacularTitle:对比腹部提压CPR与胸外按压CPR对窒息性心脏停搏患者术后脑功能预后的影响
- Author:
Yingxin CEN
1
;
Sisen ZHANG
;
Xianfa JIAO
;
Hongwei WANG
;
Xin SHA
;
Longxian ZHAO
;
Ting LIU
;
Lixiang WANG
;
Jing LI
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学附属郑州人民医院急诊及重症医学科
- Keywords:
Asphyxia cardiac arrest;
Active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
Neurologic outcome;
S100B protein;
Neuron-specific enolase;
cerebral-performance category
- From:
Chinese Critical Care Medicine
2018;30(6):549-553
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the neurologic outcome after the active abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (AACD-CPR) and chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) in asphyxia cardiac arrest (CA). Methods A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. Adult patients with CA because of asphyxia such as drowning, airway obstruction admitted to Zhengzhou People's Hospital and Sanmenxia Central Hospital from June 2014 to December 2017 were enrolled. With the informed consent of patients' families, patients were divided into AACD-CPR group and STD-CPR group according to random number table method. The blood from median cubital vein or basilic vein were extracted at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the levels of S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Neurological outcome was classified according to cerebral performance classification (CPC) after 3 months. Results A total of 183 patients were selected, including 78 ROSC patients after CPR. Patients with CA > 8 minutes and rescue time > 1 hour were excluded, 69 ROSC patients (36 in STD-CPR group and 33 in AACD-CPR group) were finally included. After ROSC, the levels of S100B protein and NSE in blood of two groups were increased gradually, reaching the peak at 6 hours, and then decreased gradually. The levels of S100B protein and NSE in AACD-CPR group at different time points after ROSC were significantly lower than those in STD-CPR group [S100B protein (μg/L): 1.62±0.52 vs. 1.88±0.46 at 1 hour, 1.71±0.41 vs. 2.02±0.58 at 6 hours, 1.24±0.37 vs. 1.52±0.59 at 12 hours, 1.05±0.23 vs. 1.28±0.37 at 24 hours, 0.82±0.29 vs. 1.05±0.36 at 48 hours; NSE (μg/L):24.76±3.02 vs. 26.78±4.29 at 1 hour, 58.78±5.58 vs. 61.68±5.44 at 6 hours, 53.87±4.84 vs. 56.78±5.68 at 12 hours, 40.96±3.52 vs. 43.13±4.50 at 24 hours, 33.23±2.89 vs. 35.54±3.44 at 48 hours; all P < 0.05]. 3 months after ROSC, the CPC classification of AACD-CPR group was lower than that of the STD-CPR group (average rank: 28.86 vs. 42.46, Z = -3.375, P < 0.001). Conclusion After suffering asphyxia CA, patients who accepted AACD-CPR had better neurologic outcome than STD-CPR.
