Analysis of spatial attention processing characteristics in patients with unilateral spatial neglect after stroke
10.3969／j.issn.1672-5921.2018.06.002
- VernacularTitle:卒中后单侧空间忽略患者的空间注意加工特点分析
- Author:
Guixiang SHAN
1
;
Lin LIU
;
Linlin YE
;
Lin ZHU
;
Lei CAO
;
Jubao DU
;
Weiqun SONG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学宣武医院康复医学科
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Unilateral spatial neglect;
Event-related potentials;
Spatial attention processing;
Mechanism
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2018;15(6):287-292
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study spatial attention processing characteristics in patients with unilateral spatial neglect (USN)by comparing the patients with right USN and behavioral findings of event-related potential (ERP)in normal subjects and the amplitude and latency of P1,N1 and P300. Methods Ten consecutive patients with USN (USN group)after right-hemisphere stroke admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Xuanwu Hospital,Capital Medical University from April 2012 to April 2013 were enrolled retrospectively. Age-and sex-matched 10 normal subjects with the USN group were selected. ERP was used to document the electroencephalogram changes of two groups of subjects when performing visual Oddball pattern tasks. The response time and accuracy of target stimuli in both groups appearing on the left (left target)and right (right target)were analyzed and compared. The amplitude and latency of all ERP components (P1,N1,P300)on the left and right target stimuli were analyzed by repeated measurement of multivariate analysis of variance. The pathogenesis of USN after stroke was investigated. Results In the USN group,the accuracy of target stimuli on left side and right side was lower than that in the normal group (left target:17. 7 ± 7. 5% vs. 98. 5 ± 7. 5%,P＜0. 01;right target:88. 5 ± 2. 0% vs. 99. 0 ± 2. 0 %,P＝0. 002). There was no significant difference in P1 amplitude between the two groups (F ＝1. 104,P ＝0. 307). When the target stimulus appeared on the left side,the N1 amplitude on the right hemisphere of the USN group was lower than that of the normal group (-0. 3 ± 1. 1 μV vs. -5. 8 ± 1. 1 μV;P＝0. 001), when the target stimulus appeared on the right side,the N1 amplitude of USN group was lower than that of the normal group (-1. 8 ± 1. 0 μV vs. -6. 0 ± 1. 0 μV;F＝9. 799,P＝0. 006). The P300 amplitude of left target of the USN group was lower than that of the normal group (1. 0 ± 1. 1 μV vs. 7. 2 ± 1. 1 μV;P＝0. 001). Compared with the normal group,the latency of each wave of P1 (right hemisphere)(136. 7 ± 3. 8 ms vs. 122. 1 ± 3. 8 ms;P ＝0. 013),N1 (179. 7 ± 2. 0 ms vs. 172. 8 ± 2. 0 ms;F ＝5. 775,P ＝0. 027),and P300 (490 ± 12 ms vs. 402 ± 12 ms;F＝27. 310,P＜0. 01]in the USN group was prolonged. Conclusion During the spatial attention processing in patients with USN,regardless of the stimuli from the left and right,its information processing had been damaged to a certain degree.
