Comparison of electronic gastroscope and rigid endoscope on removal of esophageal incarceration foreign bodies
10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.04.014
- VernacularTitle:电子胃镜与硬质食管镜取出食管嵌钝性异物的对比研究
- Author:
Shuai YUAN
1
;
Jie SHEN
;
Hai-Hua ZHOU
;
Wei ZHANG
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学附属小榄医院 消化科
- Keywords:
esophageal incarceration foreign bodies;
electronic gastroscope;
rigid endoscope;
removal of foreign bodies
- From:
China Journal of Endoscopy
2018;24(4):65-68
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and economy of electronic gastroscope and rigid endoscope on removal of esophageal incarceration foreign bodies. Methods Data of 60 patients with incarceration esophageal foreign body who underwent endoscopic removal of foreign bodies from June 2013 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into study group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30) based on the therapy way. The study group was given electronic gastroscope, and the control group was given rigid endoscope. Anesthesia method, success rate of therapy, incidence of endoscopy complication, hospitalization time and average cost of hospitalization were recorded. Results 13patients of study group received local anaesthesia, and 17 patients received intravenous anesthesia, all patients of control group received endotracheal intubation anesthesia. Success rate of therapy between the two group showed no significant difference (96.67% vs 100.00%, P > 0.05). There was no significant difference of the incidence of endoscopy complication between the two group (0.00% vs 3.33%, P > 0.05). Hospitalization time showed no significant difference between the two group [(1.70 ± 1.39) vs (2.20 ± 1.10) d, P > 0.05]. The average cost of hospitalization in study group was (2 022.00 ± 1 787.45) Yuan RMB, which was significantly lower than that of control group (5 078.00 ± 930.57, P < 0.05). Conclusion Both the way of electronic gastroscope and rigid endoscope are safe and efficient in removal of esophageal foreign bodies, but the former has more advantages in simplicity and economical efficiency.
