A Study on Nursing Intervention Classification linked to Nursing Diagnoses.
- Author:
Cho Ja KIM
;
Jong Kyung LEE
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Classification*;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Decision Making;
Delivery of Health Care;
Diagnosis;
Humans;
Iowa;
Korea;
Nursing Care;
Nursing Diagnosis*;
Nursing*;
Nursing, Supervisory;
Students, Nursing;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing
1997;9(3):353-365
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study were to label nursing intervention activities performed by Korean nurses working in medical-surgical units by using Nursing Intervention Classification, and to compare nursing intervention classification in Korea with that in Iowa, and to link nursing interventions to nursing diagnoses. This research was done in two steps. At the first step, list nursing intervention activities were used by korean nurses working in medical-surgical units and categorize and label by using Nursing Intervention Classification. The 142 nursing interventions were identified. The nursing interventions had a three-tiered taxonomic structure composed 6 domains, 27 classes, and 142 nursing interventions. At the second step, 142 interventions were linked to 57 nursing diagnoses and validated by the following 27 experts: 6 nursing professors, 11 graduate nursing students who have specialty of medical-surgical nursing, 10 head nurses who have clinical experiences over 10 years. The method of expert survey used to established the content validity of linking nursing diagnoses and nursing interventions. Questionnaire was distributed to experts. In questionnaire, the intervention labels for each of 57 nursing diagnosis were listed. Exports were asked to rate each diagnosis according to the extent to which it was validated and to identify any interventions they believed needed to be deleted or added. The analysis of results indicated that the taxonomy was well developed. More than 80% of the respondents rates s wither very validate of validate on 44 nursing diagnoses. Only 13 diagnoses were rated as validate by less than 80% of respondents. Based on validity results, revisions were made by adding 60 interventions and deleting 1 intervention. Therefore, total 201 of nursing interventions for 57 nursing diagnoses were identified. The use of standardized classifications in the areas of nursing diagnoses and interventions facilitates communication and allow us to build large computerized databases which, in turn, through their accessibility will facilitate research and clinical decision making. A common nursing language will unit nurses and make nursing care an identifiable essence of health care. Also this study adds to the enhance quality of nursing care and build a unique body of knowledge in nursing.
