Effect comparison of anterograde and reverse digital artery island flap in repairing of fingertip defects
10.11659/jjssx.07E017075
- VernacularTitle:顺行及逆行指动脉岛状皮瓣修复指端缺损的临床疗效比较
- Author:
Chao-Jian GUO
1
;
Ming SHUAI
;
Min XU
;
Feng SHUANG
;
Hao LI
;
Xu XIONG
Author Information
1. 解放军第94医院骨科
- Keywords:
fingertip defects;
digital arterial island flap;
wound repair;
digital nerve
- From:
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
2018;27(2):102-106
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of anterograde and reverse digital artery island flap in treatment of wound repairing for fingertip defects.Methods From January 2015 to December 2016,there were 35 patients with fingertip defects underwent surgical treat-ment in our hospital,including 14 cases underwent surgery with anterograde digital artery island flap(anterograde group)and 21 cases under-went surgery with reverse digital artery island flap(reverse group).The anterograde group used proper palmar digital artery and nerve as the pedicle of flap,then took forward the finger pulp flap to the injured site.The reverse flap from the dorsal of one side of finger was harvested for coverage of the distal phalanx.Results All the flaps of the 35 cases were survived.In the anterograde group,reflux obstacle of vein appeared in 1 case,and it was cured with scarification procedures.In the reverse group,there were 3 cases of vascular crisis.After dressing release and partial remove of the stitching,2 cases of them return to normal.The other 1 case suffered from flap edge necrosis,and then the wound healed after dressing change.The operation time of anterograde group was(107.5 ±18.4)min and it was(139.5 ±18.0)min in the reverse group, which showed significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).All the 35 cases were followed up for 6 to 12 months,with an average of 8.5 months.At the last follow-up,it showed that patients in both of the two groups had ruddy color,good texture and no significant bloated flap appearance.In the anterograde group,the sensory function of 12 patients restored to S4 and 2 patients restored to S3.Meanwhile,in re-verse group,5 patients restored to S3,12 patients restored to S2, and 4 patients restored to S1.The two-points discrimination of the antero-grade group was(4.22 ±0.67)mm,and it was(7.04 ±1.25)mm in the reverse group,which was significantly different(P<0.05).The in-terphalangeal joint motion was(102.67 ±7.35)°at the distal end and(64.46 ±8.37)°at the proximal end in anterograde group.And it was (100.64 ±10.29)°and(60.81 ±10.80)°respectively in the reverse group,with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The excellent and good rate was 92.8%in the anterograde group and 80.9%in the reverse group by the criteria for functional evaluation,and there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion For fingertip defects(IshikawaⅠ~Ⅲ)treated by anterograde digital artery island flap or reverse digital artery island flap both can obtained good clinical efficacy.But it has shorter operation time and better sensory recovery with anterograde digital artery island flap repairing.
