Comparison of intracranial pressure monitoring and routine monitoring in treatment of severe craniocerebral trauma
10.11659/jjssx.05E017089
- VernacularTitle:颅内压监测与常规监测在重症颅脑外伤中的应用价值比较
- Author:
Kang HU
1
;
Wen-Hao WANG
;
Chang-Chun LIU
;
Hong LIN
;
Gen-Ping CAI
;
Yuan ZHANG
Author Information
1. 解放军第175医院神经外科
- Keywords:
craniocerebral injury;
invasive intracranial pressure monitoring;
retrospective analysis;
cerebral blood supply
- From:
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
2017;26(11):807-809
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To retrospectively analyze the significance of dynamic intracranial pressure monitoring and routine monitoring in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.Methods Forty-two patients with severe craniocerebral trauma who were admitted into our hospital from March 2013 to December 2015 and underwent intracranial pressure monitoring were enrolled in this study as the observation group.Thirty-nine patients with severe traumatic brain injury who were routinely monitored within 3 hours after admission were selected as the control group in the corresponding period.Timely take drugs or surgical treatment according to the monitoring results,and analyzed the clinical efficacy,craniotomy cases,time of admission to craniotomy,and complications of the two groups.Results The cases with good prognosis in the control group was 24 (61.5％) while it was 31 (73.8％) in the observation group,and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05).The cases with poor prognosis in the control group was 15 (38.5％) while it was 11 (26.2％) in the observation group,and the difference was statistically significant(P ＜0.05).Therer were 13 cases (30.1％) of craniotomy in the control group and 5 cases (12.8％) in the observation group with statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).The time of admission to craniotomy in the control group was (24.5 ± 1.7) hours,and it was (18.3 ± 2.4) house in the observation group with statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).The incidence of intracranial infection complication was 9.5％ in the control group and 8％ in the observation group.There was no significant difference between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Invasive intracranial pressure monitoring can reflect the changes of patients in time,which can improve the clinical curative effect and would not increase the incidence of intracranial infection.
