Comparison of the effects of different blood purification methods on blood lipid metabolism and malnutrition in maintenance hemodialysis patients
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2018.22.015
- VernacularTitle:不同血液净化方式对维持性血液透析患者血脂代谢和营养不良的影响比较
- Author:
Xiaoyan XUAN
1
;
Zian LIANG
;
Jiefeng LI
;
Xiaoling CHEN
;
Sai ZHOU
;
Aicheng YANG
;
Chuncheng MA
Author Information
1. 江门市五邑中医院肾病科
- Keywords:
Hemodiafiltration;
Perfusion;
Inflammation;
Lipid metabolism;
Malnutrition;
Hemoglobins;
Albumins;
Comparative effectiveness research
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2018;25(22):2917-2921
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of different blood purification methods on blood lipid metabo-lism and malnutrition in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Methods From January 2015 to May 2017,80 patients with maintenance hemodialysis admitted in Wuyi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Jiangmen were selected. The patients were divided into study group and control group according to the random number table method,with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with hemodialysis,the study group was treated with hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis,all patients were treated for 12 weeks. The levels of total cholesterol (TC),triglyceride (TG),low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL - C),hemoglobin(Hb),total protein(TP),albumin(Alb),transferrin (TRF),interleukin 6(IL - 6) and tumor necrosis factor α(TNF - α) were compared before and after treatment. The incidence of complications at the same time were observed. Results After treatment,the levels of TC,TG,LDL - C in the study group were (4. 39 ± 0. 91) mmol/ L,(1. 41 ± 0. 20) mmol/ L,(2. 55 ± 0. 31) mmol/ L,respectively,which were lower than those in the control group [(6. 21 ± 0. 55)mmol/ L,(1. 83 ± 0. 50)mmol/ L,(3. 05 ± 0. 63)mmol/ L] (t = 10. 825,4. 933,4. 504,all P < 0. 05). After treatment,the levels of Hb,TP,Alb,TRF in the study group were (106. 83 ± 22. 05)g/ L,(62. 14 ± 22. 50)g/ L,(38. 30 ± 6. 48) g/ L,(19. 70 ± 2. 20) g/ L,respectively,which were higher than those in the control group [(94. 28 ± 13. 17)g/ L,(52. 38 ± 12. 37)g/ L,(33. 17 ± 6. 80)g/ L,(16. 24 ± 1. 54)g/ L] (t = 3. 090,2. 404,3. 454,8. 146,all P < 0. 05). After treatment,the levels of IL - 6,TNF - α in the study group were (124. 52 ± 107. 23)ng/ L,(72. 13 ± 12. 55)ng/ L,respectively,which were lower than those in the control group [(294. 14 ± 108. 92) ng/ L, (112. 45 ± 21. 29) ng/ L] ( t = 7. 019,10. 318, all P < 0. 05). The incidence rate of complications of the study group was 5. 00％ ,which was lower than 22. 50％ of the control group (χ2 = 5. 165,P < 0. 05). Conclusion Hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients can improve their blood lipid metabolism and malnutrition,reduce inflammation and the risk of complications.
