The impact of different doses of azithromycin maintenance treatment on expiratory flow limitation and quality of life among stable patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2018.06.004
- VernacularTitle:不同维持剂量阿奇霉素长程治疗对稳定期支气管扩张症患者肺功能和生命质量的影响
- Author:
Gang LU
1
;
Yuqing CHEN
;
Fengming DING
;
Xin ZHOU
Author Information
1. 200031,上海市博爱医院内科
- Keywords:
Azithromycin;
Bronchiectasis;
Chronic suppurative lung disease;
Airflow limitation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2018;41(6):493-497
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the benefits and safety of different maintenance doses of azithromycin for long-term treatment in adult patients with non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis. Methods One hundred and thirty-two indigenous outpatients (>18 years old) with stable non-CF bronchiectasis were enrolled. All patients were randomly assigned to a control group and two treatment groups. Patients in the azithromycin fixed-dose treatment group received oral azithromycin (250 mg daily) and ambroxol hydrochloride (30 mg, 3 times/d). Azithromycin progressively decreased dosage treatment group received oral azithromycin (250 mg daily for 8 weeks-250 mg 3 times/week for 8 weeks-250 mg 2 times/week for 10 weeks) and ambroxol hydrochloride (30 mg, 3 times/d). Subjects in control group only received ambroxol hydrochloride therapy. The course of treatment lasted for 26 weeks. Spirometry, exacerbations, sputum microbiology, quality of life, dyspnea scores and adverse effects were monitored after treatment for 26 weeks. Results One hundred and twenty-nine evaluable subjects completed the study. After treatment, the level of percentage of estimated value forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1% Pred) in azithromycin fixed-dose treatment group and azithromycin progressively decreased dosage treatment group was significantly higher than that before treatment: (83.01 ± 5.79)% vs. (79.39 ± 3.53)%, (84.97 ± 5.10)% vs. (80.94 ± 3.46)%, P<0.05. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25%- 75%) was also increased in two groups: (54.87 ± 5.72) % vs. (51.86 ± 8.16)%, (55.65 ± 3.39)% vs. (53.46 ± 5.75)% , there was significant difference (P<0.05). But the levels of above parameters between two groups after treatment had no significant differences (P >0.05). The parameters of FEV1% Pred, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced ventilatory capacity (FVC) and FEF25%-75%were lower compared to those before treatment in the control group (P <0.05). However, the scores of LRTI-VAS and FACED in control group after treatment were decreased slightly: (20.55 ± 1.76) scores vs. (21.34 ± 1.86) scores, P<0.05; (4.16 ± 0.75) scores vs. (4.36 ± 0.72) scores, P > 0.05. Seven episodes of acute exacerbation was occured during 26 weeks, 2 cases exited. The others did not interrupt azithromycin treatment during acute exacerbation. Drug-related adverse reactions were mild. Conclusions For adult stable patients with non-CF bronchiectasis, the clinical symptoms and airflow limitation are improved after long-term treatment of low-dose azithromycin. Similar effects on FACED score and LRTI-VAS score are observed in patients with progressively decreased dosage of azithomycin.
