Comparison of the effect between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in the treatment of renal pelvis calculus
10.7683/xxyxyxb.2018.02.013
- VernacularTitle:经皮肾镜取石术与后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗肾盂结石疗效比较
- Author:
Zhong-Min JING
1
;
Xue-Ren LU
;
Hai-Liang XU
;
Ming-Liang XIA
;
Xue-Pei ZHANG
Author Information
1. 驻马店市中心医院泌尿外科
- Keywords:
renal pelvis calculus;
retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy;
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- From:
Journal of Xinxiang Medical College
2018;35(2):133-135,139
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect between percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLP) in the treatment of renal pelvis calculus,so as to provide evidence for the treatment of renal pelvis calculus.Methods A total of 108 patients with renal pelvis calculus were selected from January 2012 to December 2016 in Zhumadian Central Hospital.The patients were divided into PCNL group (n =59) and RLP group (n =49) according to the therapeutic method.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative blood transfusion rate,operative success rate,stone clearance rate,postoperative hemoglobin reduction,postoperative analgesia time,postoperative hospitalization time and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The success rate of operation in PC-NL group and RLP group was 94.9％ (56/59) and 100.0％ (49/49) respectively,there was no significant difference in the success rate of operation between the two groups (x2 =1.026,P ＞ 0.05).The stone clearance rate in PCNL group and RLP group was 94.9％ (56/59) and 98.0％ (48/49) respectively,there was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (x2 =0.140,P ＞ 0.05).The intraoperative blood transfusion rate in PCNL group and RLP group was 5.1％ (3/59) and 2.0％ (1/49) respectively,there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood transfusion rate between the two groups (x2 =0.105,P ＞ 0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative analgesia time between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Compared with the PCNL group,the blood loss and postoperative hemoglobin reduction were less,and the postoperative hospitalization time was shorter in the RLP group (P ＜ 0.05).The incidence of postoperative urinary leakage,urinary tract infection and secondary hemorrhage in PCNL group was 3.4％ (2/59),8.5％ (5/59)and 6.8％ (4/59) respectively;the incidence of postoperative urinary leakage,urinary tract infection and secondary hemorrhage in RLP group was 8.2％ (4/49),4.1％ (2/49) and 4.1％ (2/49) respectively;there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative urinary leakage,urinary tract infection and secondary hemorrhage between the two groups (x2 =2.975,1.064,1.811;P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of PCNL and RLP in the treatment of renal pelvis calculus is fairly,and their safety is high.However,RLP has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding,quick postoperative recovery and short hospitalization time.
