Comparison of prognosis on patients with coronary critical lesion assessed by coronary angiography , FFR and FD-OCT
10.3969/j.issn.1008-0074.2018.03.15
- VernacularTitle:冠脉造影术、FFR技术及FD-OCT评估的冠脉临界病变患者预后的比较
- Author:
Xing-Rui FANG
1
;
Jian-Sheng WU
;
You-Sheng GUO
;
Zhi-Yong LIAO
Author Information
1. 中山大学附属第八医院(深圳福田)心内科
- Keywords:
Coronary angiography;
Fractional flow reserve,myocardial;
Tomography,optical coherence
- From:
Chinese Journal of cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
2018;27(3):293-296
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective :To explore influence on prognosis in patients with coronary critical lesion assessed by coronary angiography (CAG) ,CAG combined coronary fractional flow reserve test (FFR) and CAG combined frequency do-main optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT ).Methods : Patients with coronary critical lesion who don't need stenting were screened by three detection programs , they were divided into CAG group (n＝ 45 , only received CAG) ,CAG+ FFR group (n＝45 ,received CAG+FFR) and CAG+ FD-OCT group (n＝45 ,received CAG+ FD-OCT).All three groups received secondary prevention of stable coronary heart disease for half a year .Incidence rates of angina pectoris (aggravated ) ,myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization rate were observed and compared among three groups .Results :Compared with CAG group ,there were significant reductions in inci-dence rates of angina pectoris (33.3% vs.4.4%,6.7%) ,myocardial infarction (20.0% vs.4.4%,2.2%) and target vessel revascularization rate (26.6% vs.6.7%,2.2%) in CAG+FFR group and CAG+FD-OCT group ,P＜0.05 or ＜0.01. There were no significant difference between CAG + FFR group and CAG+ FD-OCT group , P＞0.05 all.Conclusion : Compared with pure CAG ,CAG combined FFR or FD-OCT can more effectively assess cardi-ac blood supply ,and improvement prognosis in patients with critical lesion .
