Efficacy analysis of porcine small intestine submucosa-derived mesh and polypropylene mesh applied in anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2018.11.008
- VernacularTitle:猪小肠黏膜下层脱细胞基质补片与聚丙烯补片应用于前腹壁切口疝修补术的疗效分析
- Author:
Weigang DAI
1
;
Zhihui CHEN
;
Jinfu TAN
;
Yujie YUAN
;
Jidong ZUO
;
Qiongyun ZHAO
;
Min TAN
Author Information
1. 中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科中心疝与腹壁外科
- Keywords:
Abdominal wall incisional hernia;
Hernia repair;
Laparoscopy;
Biologic mesh;
Polypropylene mesh;
Complications;
Recurrence
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
2018;17(11):1095-1100
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of porcine small intestine submucosa-derived (SIS) mesh and polypropylene (PP) mesh applied in anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinical data of 59 patients who underwent anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University between January 2012 and December 2017 were collected.Of 59 patients,22 undergoing anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair with SIS mesh and 37 undergoing anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair with PP mesh were respectively allocated into the SIS group and PP group.Surgeons selected surgical procedures according to hernia ring situations of patients.Observation indicators:(l) intra-and post-operative recovery situations;(2) follow-up.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect long-term complications of patients including foreign body sensation or pain in abdominal wall and hernia recurrence up to May 2018.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)±s,and comparison between groups was done using t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range),and comparison between groups was done using Mann-Whitney U test.Comparison of count data was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results (1) Intra-and post-operative recovery situations:patients of the SIS group and PP group underwent successfully anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair.There were 2,3,3,14 and 5,26,1,5 patients undergoing open Onlay repair,open Sublay repair,laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair,laparoscopic combined with open mesh repair in the SIS group and PP group respectively.The volume of intraoperative blood loss,cases of postoperative incisional seroma and surgical site infection were (23± 11)mL,7,5 in the SIS group and (30± 13)mL,3,1 in the PP group respectively,with statistically significant differences between groups (t=-2.238,P＜0.05).(2) Follow-up:patients of the SIS group and PP group were respectively followed up for 29.3 months (6.0-66.0 months) and 31.0 months (7.0-76.0 months),with no statistically significant difference between groups (Z =-1.388,P＞0.05).During the follow-up,foreign body sensation or pain in abdominal wall and hernia recurrence were detected in 6,6 patients in the SIS group and 4,2 patients in the PP group respectively,with a statistically significant difference in hernia recurrence between groups (P＜0.05) and with no statistically significant difference in foreign body sensation or pain in abdominal wall between groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion Compared with polypropylene mesh,anterior abdominal wall incisional hernia repair using SIS mesh has higher incidence rate of postoperative incisional seroma,surgical site infection and hernia recurrence,but fewer volume of intraoperative blood loss.
