Submental island flap for repairing oral defect after radical resection of oral cancer
10.11958/20171064
- VernacularTitle:应用颏下岛状瓣修复口腔癌术后缺损
- Author:
Li MENG
1
;
Jun SHEN
;
Hao LIU
;
Jie MU
;
Wei CHEN
;
Jun ZHANG
;
Chao WANG
;
Ying-Bin YAN
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学 300070
- Keywords:
mouth neoplasms;
oral surgical procedures;
surgical flaps;
submental island flap;
maxillofacial defect repair
- From:
Tianjin Medical Journal
2018;46(5):527-532
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To summarize the surgery skills and evaluate the clinical outcome of submental island flap for repairing oral defect after radical resection of oral cancer. Methods A total of 25 consecutive patients underwent submental island flap reconstruction after ablative surgery for oral cancer from January 2015 to May 2017 were enrolled in this study. The patterns of venous return, the technique notes and postoperative complications were summarized. The oncological safety of submental island flap in oral reconstruction was analyzed. Results The submental island flaps were harvested with the sizes ranging from(5 cm×3 cm)to(12 cm×5 cm).The mean operation time was(350.5±50.5)min.The vein of the flap was found to drain into the facial vein,and then returned to the internal jugular vein in 17 patients(68.0%), into the external jugular vein in 4 patients(16%),and into the anterior jugular vein in 4 patients(16%).Twenty-four flaps survived completely,and 1 flap failed due to the damage of the submental artery.Wound infection occurred in only 1 patient, and primary wound healing was observed in the other 24 patients. Eight patients (32.0%) with cervical lymph node metastases were verified by the postoperative pathological examination, 4 patients were submandibular lymph node metastases.The prevalence of occult lymph node metastasis involving level Ⅰwas 16.0%.The mean follow-up period was (14.3 ± 5.2) months. Local recurrence was found in 1 patient and cervical recurrence in 2 patients without postoperative radiotherapy during the follow-up. Conclusion There are three various drainage patterns for the venous return of submental island flap.Our data suggest that vein drainage of the flap into the external jugular vein and the anterior jugular vein,which are previously overlooked,should receive greater attention during the harvest of submental flap to avoid venous congestion and flap loss.Close follow-up or postoperative radiotherapy are recommended for patients without cervical lymph node metastases.