Comparative analysis of the modified laparoscopic swenson and laparoscopic soave procedure for children with short-segment hirschsprung disease
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.12.023
- VernacularTitle:改良腹腔镜Swenson与Soave术对儿童短段型先天性巨结肠疗效差异
- Author:
Yaohao WU
1
;
Lexiang ZENG
;
Ronglin QIU
;
Jie ZHANG
;
Jia-Jia ZHOU
;
Wenli JIANG
;
Xiaogeng DENG
Author Information
1. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院小儿外科
- Keywords:
laparoscopic Swenson;
laparoscopic Soave;
Hirschsprung disease;
pediatric
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2018;34(12):2015-2018
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the characteristics,complications and outcomes of the modified lapa-roscopic Swenson(MLSw)and laparoscopic Soave(LS)procedures for children with short-segment Hirschsprung disease(HD). Methods Seventy-seven pediatric patients with HD who underwent surgery from March 2007 to December 2016 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Twenty-six patients were treated with LS and 51 cases un-derwent MLSw. The preoperative,operative and postoperative data was collected,with follow-up periods ranging from 12 to 48 months. The perioperative/operative characteristics,postoperative complications,and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results On average,the patients in the LS group had a longer operating time than that in the MLSw group(P < 0.05). Blood loss was significantly less in the MLSw group than that in the LS group(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in feeding time between the two groups(P > 0.05). The MLSw group was discharged after a shorter hospitalization time than that in the LS group(P < 0.05). The MLSw group had lower incidences of postoperative complications than those in the LS group in the early postoperative period,with no significant difference in the rate of complications during the late postoperative period was found between the two groups. Conclusions Both LS and MLSw are suitable for treatment of children with short-segment HD. However,the MLSw operation is much simpler,with less operating time,less intraoperative blood loss,shorter hospitalization time and better bowel control in the early postoperative period. We favor this approach because it allows complete removal of the entire original aganglionic bowel,without leaving behind a cuff.
