Investigate the effect of thoracic and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube on the pain and comfort of minimally invasive esophageal cancer patients and nursing care
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.14.003
- VernacularTitle:经胸、腹放置纵隔引流管对食管癌术后患者舒适度的比较及护理探讨
- Author:
Jin GUO
1
;
Enshe JIANG
;
Yin LI
;
Jingru CHEN
;
Dengyun WANG
;
Dongying LIU
Author Information
1. 河南大学护理与健康学院
- Keywords:
Esophageal resection;
Accelerated rehabilitation surgery;
Mediastinum drainage;
Comfort nursing
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2018;34(14):1050-1054
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Compare the effect of thoracic and abdominal mediastinal tube placement on pain and comfort in patients with minimally invasive esophageal cancer and nursing care. Methods 108 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus were selected from December 2016 to May 2017. The patients were divided into chest group and abdominal group according to the random number comparison table, each with 54 cases. All patients underwent minimally invasive radical resection of esophageal carcinoma. The mediastinum drainage tube was placed at different locations of the chest and abdomen after operation. The duration of intubation, total drainage volume, number of dressing change before and after extubation, degree of pain and comfort after surgery were recorded, drainage tube failure and the incidence of related complication were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in duration of intubation, total drainage volume, drainage tube failure and the incidence of related complication between Patients with mediastinal tubes placed through the chest and abdomen(P>0.05). The times of dressing change before and after extubation in the abdominal group were (2.8 ± 1.0), (1.9 ± 0.6) times, those in the chest group were (4.5 ± 1.2), (3.6 ± 1.1) times, there were significant difference between the two groups (t=7.841, 9.377, P<0.01). The NRS and VAS score at 1-4 days and extubation in the abdominal group were significantly lower than those in the chest group, the abdominal group were (3.2±1.0), (2.7±0.8), (2.3±0.7), (1.9±0.7), (1.5±0.6) points and (3.7±0.8), (3.4±1.4), (3.0± 0.7), (2.6±1.0), (2.6±1.0) points, the chest group were (3.7±1.3), (3.3±1.1), (2.8±0.8), (2.3±0.8), (2.3±0.7) points and (5.0±0.9), (4.3±1.4), (4.1±1.3), (3.3±1.2), (3.6±1.0) points, there were significant difference between the two groups (t=2.443-7.247, P<0.01 or 0.05). Conclusions Intraoperative abdominal minimally invasive radical mediastinal tube placed esophageal cancer, can significantly relieve pain and improve patient comfort, reduce the frequency of dressing change before and after extubation, not only quickly improve the rehabilitation of patients, but also can avoid the waste of medical resources, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
