Effects of different skin interventions in the result of penicillin skin test:a network Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.04.017
- VernacularTitle:青霉素皮试前不同皮肤处理方法对皮试结果影响的贝叶斯网状Meta分析
- Author:
Qin YANG
1
;
Jun ZHANG
;
Ying REN
;
Shurong QIN
Author Information
1. 730000兰州,大学第一医院特需外科
- Keywords:
Penicillin;
Intradermal Injection;
Disinfector;
Network Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2018;34(4):315-320
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effects of seven different skin interventions in the result of penicillin skin test by network Meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Database from construction to July 2017 was carried out. Control trials examining the effects of skin interventions on the false positive rate of penicillin skin test were included. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0.All data was screened,extracted and reviewed by 2 researchers independently and analyzed by WinBUGS, R and Stata. Results Totally 18 trials involving 25 077 patients were included.The results of network Meta-analysis showed the statistically significant difference in favor of saline, 0.5% glutaral and iodine-containing disinfector when compared to alcohol (P<0.05). However,there was no difference in effects between other different skin interventions on the false positive rate (P>0.05). Probability ranking showed that there was a great possibility for saline, direct injection, 0.5% glutaral and iodine-containing disinfector in the reduction of false positive rate. Conclusions Saline, 0.5% glutaral and iodine-containing disinfector were superior to other skin interventions in reducing false positive rate of penicillin skin test.
