Practice and discussion on prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis based on multidisciplinary integration
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.03.003
- VernacularTitle:基于多学科一体化的静脉血栓防治实践与探讨
- Author:
Chen SHEN
1
;
Huiling LI
;
Jie GU
;
Yefang ZOU
;
Qi FANG
Author Information
1. 215006,苏州大学医学部护理学院
- Keywords:
Venous thromboembolism;
Multidisciplinary;
Cooperation between doctor and nurse;
Prophylaxis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2018;34(3):171-175
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effective e measures of the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis in hospital and evaluate the effect of"antibolt work"in patients with multidisciplinary cooperation. Methods Compare the level of venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence, average hospital day, patient satisfaction and the level of knowledge of medical staff in the high risk department of VTE. Results After intervention in high-risk departments staff VTE related knowledge level improved, 2013 high- risk departments medical staff about the basic knowledge, risk assessment, VTE prevention knowledge of three dimensional awareness were 34.7％ (26/75), 49.3％ (37/75), 32.0％ (24/75), respectively, 2016 were 56.0％(42/75), 69.3％(52/75), 90.7％(68/75), respectively, two groups compare the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.887, 6.217, 54.423, P<0.01 or 0.05). Reduced incidence of VTE 2 groups, 2013 annual incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were 31.7％ (38/120), 11.7％ (14/120), respectively, in 2016 the annual incidence of DVT and PE were 14.2％(17/120), 4.2％(5/120), respectively, two groups compare the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =10.402, 4.630, P<0.01 or 0.05). VTE in 2016 patients with high-risk departments the average hospitalization time significantly below 2013, 2013 was (18.3 ± 3.5) days while 2016 was (12.7 ± 2.9 )days, two groups compare the difference was statistically significant (t = 13.496, P < 0.01). In 2016, the satisfaction rate of patients with VTE was higher than that in 2013, 77.5％(93/120) in 2013, 90.8％(109/120) in 2016, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=8.004, P=0.005). Conclusion The prevention and control of venous thrombosis based on multi-disciplinary integration is effective in preventing the occurrence of thrombosis in hospitalized patients and is worthy of clinical promotion.
