Comparison of Clarus video stylet,HPHJ-A video laryngoscope and Airtraq laryngoscope for guiding oral tracheal intubation in patients with snoring
10.12089/jca.2018.03.013
- VernacularTitle:鼾症患者使用三种不同可视喉镜行经口气管插管的比较
- Author:
Ruiwen DING
1
;
Zhenhua JIA
;
Huibi OUYANG
;
Xuankai DENG
;
Yawen WU
;
Chuiliang LIU
Author Information
1. 广东医科大学附属佛山禅城中心医院麻醉科
- Keywords:
Video laryngoscope;
Snoring patient;
Oral tracheal intubation
- From:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
2018;34(3):263-266
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effectiveness and feasibility of oral tracheal intubation with Clarus video stylet,HPHJ-A video laryngoscope and Airtraq laryngoscope and in snoring pa-tients.Methods Ninety patients undergoing elective snoring surgery with general anesthesia,3 9 males and 51 females,aged 22-55 years,BMI 25-29 kg/m2,ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ,were ran-domly divided into three equal-sized groups (n=30):Clarus Video Stylet group (group C),HPHJ-A video laryngoscope group (group H)and Airtraq laryngoscope group (group A).The time of success-ful endotracheal intubation and the success rate of initial intubation of all groups were observed.The mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate(HR)and Rate-pressure product(RPP)were also monitored before induction of anesthesia(T0),before tracheal intubation(T1),at 0 min(T2),1 min (T3),and 3 min (T4)after intubation,as well as the throat injury and hemorrhage were noted. Results Patients in group C were successful intubated.Two patients in group H and one patient in group A with failed intubation were successfully intubated by using Clarus video stylet.The time re-quired for successful intubation in group C was longer than groups H and A (P<0.05).Compared with T0,the increasing of hemodynamic parameters (MAP,HR,RPP)after induction of all groups were significant(P<0.05).Compared with T1,the HR,MAP and RPP were increased significantly at T2in all groups (P<0.05).Compared with T1,the MAP and RPP were increased significantly at T3in all groups,and the HR were increased significantly at T3in groups H and A (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the HR between T1and T3in group C.The increase in the HR and RPP at T2 was lower in group C than that in both the groups H and A (P <0.05).The changes of hemodynamic parameters were no significant among the three groups at other time.The differences of sore throat score and hemorrhage were no significant.Conclusion Compared with HPHJ-A video laryngoscope and Airtraq laryngoscope,Clarus video stylet for guiding oral tracheal intubation in snoring patients have less influence on hemodynamic parameters,and have no limited mouth opening. But Clarus Video Stylet spends longer intubating times,and has no obvious advantages on preventing throat injury.
