The comparison of two methods to evaluate malnutrition
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2018.13.008
- VernacularTitle:两种评定营养不良方法的对比研究
- Author:
Hui ZHANG
1
;
Xiaoping ZENG
;
Li QIAN
;
Shan HAN
Author Information
1. 贵州省人民医院,贵阳550002
- Keywords:
malnutrition;
nutritional support;
nutritional risk tool 2002
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2018;47(13):1731-1732,1736
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the incidence of malnutrition in patients with stomach cancer,intestinal obstruction,colon and rectal cancer by using two assessments.Methods Inpatients were consecutively recorded,to diagnose malnutrition,one way was using BMI＜18.5 kg/m2,another one was three variablesweight loss of NRS2002,and then compare its incidence.Results A total of 226 patients were recruited.Malnutrition rate which was 11.06％ by using BMI,was lower than that using NRS2002 (14.60％).Patients who accepted adequate nutrition support was 7.96％,no-adequate nutrition support was 17.26％,and extremely no-adequate nutrition support accounted for 5.31％.Conclusion Adopting NRS2002 to diagnose malnutrition is worthy to promote.
