Feasibility analysis on 3D laparoscopic surgery via transrectal extraction of specimens without abdominal incision in the treatment of slow transit constipation.
- Author:
Bing LU
1
;
Chuangang FU
2
;
Zhuqing ZHOU
3
;
Junyi HAN
3
;
Tao DU
3
;
Zhe ZHU
3
;
Wei GAO
3
;
Qixin JIANG
3
;
Fang JI
3
;
Zhenyu ZHANG
3
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Colectomy; methods; Constipation; surgery; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Operative Time; Rectum; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2018;21(8):901-907
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the safety and feasibility of 3D laparoscopic surgery via transrectal extraction of specimens without abdominal incision in the treatment of slow transit constipation (STC).
METHODSFrom May 2015 to January 2017, 8 STC patients (6 females and 2 males) with informed consent were selected to receive subtotal colectomy with 3D laparoscopy as the no-incision incision group, in which the initial part of ascending colon and rectum were end-to-end anastomosed directly after extraction of the specimen through the rectum. Twelve STC patients (9 females and 3 males) undergoing traditional subtotal colectomy with 3D laparoscopy were selected as the traditional group by case matching method (gender, age, BMI, the difference of receiving operation time less than 12 months, same surgeon team). Perioperative parameters (operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, exhausting time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, postoperative pain score and additional pain management), inflammation index at postoperative day 1 and day 3 (leukocyte, procalcitonin, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein), postoperative peritoneal infection, wound healing, short-term and long-term efficacy, patient satisfaction evaluation (subjective hundred-mark system) at postoperative one year were compared between two groups.
RESULTSThere were no significant differences between two groups in operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, exhausting time, postoperative hospital stay and morbidity of complication (all P>0.05). Significantly lower pain scores at postoperative 6-hour (median 3.0 vs. 4.5, U=23.0, P=0.042), lower ratio of additional analgesic at postoperative day 1(1/8 vs. 7/12, P=0.040) were found in the no-incision group. Leukocyte level at postoperative day 1 was significantly lower in the no-incision group [(11.0±3.5)×10/L vs. (14.7±3.6)×10/L, t=-2.281, P=0.035]. C-reactive protein concentration at postoperative day 3 was not significantly different between two groups but with different trend [median 78.1(0.1 to 154.0) mg/L vs. 22.0 (7.0 to 55.9) mg/L,U=33.0, P=0.047]. There were no significant differences of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin between two groups(all P>0.05). All the patients had follow-up for 14-31 months. Subjective effectiveness score was 90±9 in the no-incision group and 94±6 in the traditional group without significant difference(t=-1.099, P=0.286). No long-term complications associated with abdominal infection was observed in the no-incision group.
CONCLUSION3D laparoscopic subtotal colectomy via transrectal extraction of specimens without abdominal incision in the treatment of STC has similar short-term and long-term efficacies compared with traditional laparoscopic assisted surgery, and does not increase the probability of abdominal contamination.