Combined Effects of Electroacupuncture and Behavioral Training on Learning-Memory Ability and Event-Related Potential P300 in Rats with Mid/Advanced Cerebral Infarction.
- Author:
Qian YU
1
;
Xiao-Hong LI
2
;
Wei JIANG
3
;
Ya-Mei LI
1
;
Xiao-Dong DUAN
3
;
Wei WEI
4
;
Jing FU
1
;
Lin HUANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Cerebral Infarction; Electroacupuncture; Event-Related Potentials; Exercise Therapy; P300; Rats
- MeSH: Acupuncture Points; Animals; Cerebral Infarction; Disease Models, Animal; Electroacupuncture; Evoked Potentials; Humans; Rats; Rats, Inbred ACI; Rats, Sprague-Dawley
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(18):2172-2178
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BackgroundThe effectiveness of the combination of electroacupuncture (EA) and behavioral training (BT) for mid/advanced cerebral infarction (M/ACI) and related mechanisms remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the combined effects on the learning-memory ability and event-related potential P300 in rats with M/ACI.
MethodsEighty rats with M/ACI were divided into Group Model (M), Group EA, Group BT, and Group EA-BT (n = 20) according to the random number with five healthy rats in Group Control (CON). On the 6 week after modeling, EA, BT, and EA-BT were given to Group EA, Group BT, and Group EA-BT, respectively, whereas Group M and Group CON were not given any intervention. Y-maze test and P300 were recorded before and after the intervention.
ResultsAfter intervention, the P300 latency was lower and the amplitude was higher in the Group EA-BT, Group EA, and Group BT than before (for latency, t = -7.638, -4.334, and -5.916; for amplitude, t = 8.125, 3.846, and 5.238; P < 0.01), with Group EA-BT superior to Group EA (for latency, t = -3.708; for amplitude, t = 3.653; P < 0.01) and Group BT (for latency, t = -2.067; for amplitude, t = 2.816; P < 0.05), with no significant difference between Group BT and EA (for latency, t = -1.439; for amplitude, t = 1.075; P > 0.05). While the performances of Y-maze tests in the Group EA-BT, Group EA, and Group BT were all better than before (t = 10.359, 4.520, and 7.791, P < 0.01), with Group EA-BT better than Group EA (t = 5.627, P < 0.01) and Group BT (t = 2.913, P < 0.01) respectively, and Group BT better than Group EA (t = 2.912, P < 0.01).
ConclusionEA or BT can affect P300 in rats with M/ACI, and the combination of these two methods can significantly improve the learning-memory ability.