Penile erectile strength measurement band for differentiation and classification of erectile dysfunction.
- Author:
Zi-Bin LIN
1
;
Jun-Hong DENG
1
;
Liang-Liang HUANG
1
;
Hua SHI
1
;
Jian-Ming LIU
1
;
Bin OU-YANG
1
;
Jing-Xuan XIE
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: nocturnal penile tumescence test; penile erectile strength measurement band; erectile dysfunction
- MeSH: Case-Control Studies; Coitus; Diagnostic Errors; statistics & numerical data; Erectile Dysfunction; classification; diagnosis; physiopathology; psychology; Humans; Male; Penile Erection; physiology
- From:National Journal of Andrology 2018;24(6):520-524
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo study the clinical application value of the penile erectile strength measurement (PESM) band in the differentiation of psychogenic from organic erectile dysfunction (ED).
METHODSEighty ED patients unable to achieve or maintain adequate penile erection to complete sexual intercourse were included in the experimental group and another 40 healthy subjects with normal erectile function enrolled as controls. The ED cases were classified into mild, moderate and severe ED according to the IIEF-5 scores and divided into psychogenic and organic ED based on the results of the nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) test. Then all the subjects underwent a three-night continuous monitoring with the PESM band and, according to the band fracture rate, the ED cases were also classified into psychogenic and organic ED. The rates of missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and diagnostic coincidence of PESM were calculated with the results of NPT as the standard for differentiating psychogenic from organic ED.
RESULTSThe results of NPT tests revealed 51 cases of psychogenic and 29 cases of organic ED in the experimental group. The band fracture rate in PESM was 95.0% in the mild, 80.9% in the moderate and 52.8% in the severe ED patients. Of the 51 cases of psychogenic ED detected by NPT test, 43 were diagnosed as psychogenic and the other 8 as organic ED with the PESM band, with a coincidence rate of 84.3%. Of the 29 cases of organic ED revealed by NPT test, 5 were diagnosed as psychogenic and the other 24 as organic ED by PESM, with a coincidence rate of 82.8%. Normal erectile function with three-level fracture of the band was observed in the PESM of the normal controls, which showed a coincidence rate of 100% with the results of NPT tests. Based on the standard of the NPT test, the rates of missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and diagnostic coincidence of the PESM band in differentiating psychogenic from organic ED were 15.7%, 17.2%, and 83.8%, respectively, with a Kappa value of 0.656 (P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONSThe penile erectile strength measurement band can be used as a screening tool for initial differentiation of psychogenic from organic ED.
