Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-institution experience.
- Author:
Michelle Shu Fen TSENG
1
;
Huili ZHENG
2
;
Ivy Wei Shan NG
1
;
Yiat Horng LEONG
1
;
Cheng Nang LEONG
1
;
Wei Peng YONG
3
;
Wai Kit CHEONG
4
;
Jeremy Chee Seong TEY
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: chemotherapy; neoadjuvant therapy; radiotherapy; rectal cancer; surgery
- From:Singapore medical journal 2018;59(6):305-310
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTIONNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer has been shown to improve local control and reduce toxicity, as compared to adjuvant CRT. We reported the outcomes of our patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated at National University Hospital, Singapore.
METHODSFrom April 2002 to December 2014, 117 patients with T3/4, N0/+, M0 rectal cancer received neoadjuvant CRT followed by TME surgery. The treatment regimen comprised a total radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions delivered concurrently with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine chemotherapy over 5.5 weeks. All patients were planned for TME surgery. Local control, disease-free survival, overall survival and treatment toxicities were analysed.
RESULTSMedian follow-up was 34 (range 2-122) months. 11.5% (13/113) of patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) and 72.6% (85/117) had either tumour or nodal downstaging following neoadjuvant CRT. 5.2% (5/96) of patients had Grade 3 acute toxicities (dermatitis and diarrhoea) and 3.1% (3/96) had Grade 3 late toxicities (fistula and stricture). There was no Grade 4 toxicity noted. The five-year local recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 4.5%, 65.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that nodal positivity was a predictor of poor disease-free survival and poor overall survival. Tumour downstaging and pCR did not improve outcomes.
CONCLUSIONOur outcomes were comparable to internationally published data, and this treatment regimen remains the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer in our local population.