Antibiotics De-Escalation in the Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Study on Propensity Score Matching Method.
- Author:
Hu LI
1
;
Chun-Hui YANG
1
;
Li-Ou HUANG
1
;
Yu-Hui CUI
1
;
Dan XU
1
;
Chun-Rong WU
1
;
Jian-Guo TANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: De-Escalation; Propensity Score Matching; Trauma; Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
- MeSH: APACHE; Anti-Bacterial Agents; therapeutic use; Female; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; drug therapy; pathology; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(10):1151-1157
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BackgroundAntimicrobial de-escalation refers to starting the antimicrobial treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics, followed by narrowing the drug spectrum according to culture results. The present study evaluated the effect of de-escalation on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in trauma patients.
MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted on trauma patients with VAP, who received de-escalation therapy (de-escalation group) or non-de-escalation therapy (non-de-escalation group). Propensity score matching method was used to balance the baseline characteristics between both groups. The 28-day mortality, length of hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit stay, and expense of antibiotics and hospitalization between both groups were compared. Multivariable analysis explored the factors that influenced the 28-day mortality and implementation of de-escalation.
ResultsAmong the 156 patients, 62 patients received de-escalation therapy and 94 patients received non-de-escalation therapy. No significant difference was observed in 28-day mortality between both groups (28.6% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.620). The duration of antibiotics treatment in the de-escalation group was shorter than that in the non-de-escalation group (11 [8-13] vs. 14 [8-19] days, P = 0.045). The expenses of antibiotics and hospitalization in de-escalation group were significantly lower than that in the non-de-escalation group (6430 ± 2730 vs. 7618 ± 2568 RMB Yuan, P = 0.043 and 19,173 ± 16,861 vs. 24,184 ± 12,039 RMB Yuan, P = 0.024, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, high injury severity score, multi-drug resistant (MDR) infection, and inappropriate initial antibiotics were associated with patients' 28-day mortality, while high APACHE II score, MDR infection and inappropriate initial antibiotics were independent factors that prevented the implementation of de-escalation.
ConclusionsDe-escalation strategy in the treatment of trauma patients with VAP could reduce the duration of antibiotics treatments and expense of hospitalization, without increasing the 28-day mortality and MDR infection.